Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Raleigh, 778 N.W.2d 90.

860 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Green Isiah Kelly, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Kai Yang Minn. Ct. App. 2014
2; d 90, 93 (Minn. 2010).
State of Minnesota v. Green Isiah Kelly, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Mohammed Mohammed Ali Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Maurion Jameal Travis v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Mohammed Mohammed Ali Minn. Ct. App. 2014
See, (holding under “manifest injustice” standard that a defendant’s claim that he “was under extreme stress and not thinking rationally when he entered his plea” did not provide a ground for plea withdrawal); (stating that “the normal trauma associ
Maurion Jameal Travis v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Todd Eugene Trahan Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Basil Benna Dudley Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Todd Eugene Trahan Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Basil Benna Dudley Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(concluding that because the record established that a defendant understood the direct consequences of his guilty plea, the plea was intelligent).
State of Minnesota v. Michael Lee Everly Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Michael Lee Everly Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Samuel Wayne Behrens, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Jeffrey Charles Morris v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Samuel Wayne Behrens, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Jeffrey Charles Morris v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Dusty Lee Littledog Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Steven Anthoni McMorris-Rice, Appellant./li> Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Brian Jeffrey Copeland Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Charles Chuck Jackson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Charles Chuck Jackson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Steven Anthoni McMorris-Rice, Appellant./li> Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Dusty Lee Littledog Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Brian Jeffrey Copeland Minn. Ct. App. 2014
4 (rejecting Raleigh’s argument that his plea was involuntary when he provided inadequate explanation as to how improper pressure or coercion influenced his decision).
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Eugene Quinn Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Robert Earl Pittman, Jr. v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Robert Earl Pittman, Jr. v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Eugene Quinn Minn. Ct. App. 2014
1.1 “A manifest injustice exists if a guilty plea is not valid.”
State of Minnesota v. Eric Lee Budreau Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Shantha Jayapathy v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Eric Lee Budreau Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Shantha Jayapathy v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Robert Lee Crisler Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Robert Lee Crisler Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“The [fair-and-just] standard requires district courts to give due consideration to two factors: (1) the reasons a 4 defendant advances to support withdrawal and (2) prejudice granting the motion would cause the [s]tate given reliance on the plea.” (quotation marks omitted).
Dion Dalvante Harris v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Samuel Johosephat Taylor Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Dion Dalvante Harris v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
–94 (Minn. 2010) (citing Minn. R. Crim.
State of Minnesota v. Samuel Johosephat Taylor Minn. Ct. App. 2014
David Laurence Hodges v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
David Laurence Hodges v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“A defendant bears the burden of showing his plea was invalid.”
State of Minnesota v. Evalyn Lia Bheaanu Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Evalyn Lia Bheaanu Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Barrow v. State 845 N.W.2d 555 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Barrow v. State 845 N.W.2d 555 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Klug 839 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Klug 839 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
“Assessing the validity of a plea presents a question of law that we review de novo.”
State v. Cubas 838 N.W.2d 220 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Cubas 838 N.W.2d 220 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
-98 (Minn.2010) (holding that a district court did not abuse its discretion in denying plea withdrawal under the fair-and-just standard when “the prejudice to the [sjtate was overstated” but the defendant “failed to provide any valid reason why withdrawal would be ‘fair and just’ ”).
Uselman v. State 831 N.W.2d 690 Minn. Ct. App. 2013