Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Gaiovnik, 794 N.W.2d 643.

120 citing documents.

State v. Willis 898 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Emile Rey 890 N.W.2d 135 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Emile Rey 890 N.W.2d 135 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Tetee Saryee d/b/a Zion Home Care, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Tetee Saryee d/b/a Zion Home Care, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(holding that noncompliance with section 611A.045 at the district court does not preclude appellate 7 challenges to the district court’s authority to award restitution).
State of Minnesota v. John William Zastrow Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. John William Zastrow Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Erick Larkins Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Erick Larkins Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“[T]he typical procedure that a defendant must follow in order to preserve a sentencing issue for appeal is to raise the issue with the district court.”
Moulton v. Simon 883 N.W.2d 819 Minn. 2016
Moulton v. Simon 883 N.W.2d 819 Minn. 2016
The object of statutory interpretation is to “ascertain and effectuate -the intent of the legislature,” We begin'with the language of the statute, which we construe according to its plain and ordinary’meaning.
State of Minnesota v. Berry Alan Willis 883 N.W.2d 838 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Berry Alan Willis 883 N.W.2d 838 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Gila River Indian Community v. Department of Child Safety 379 P.3d 1016 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Gric v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State of Minnesota v. Aloeng Kelly Vang, A14-1574 881 N.W.2d 551 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Aloeng Kelly Vang, A14-1574 881 N.W.2d 551 Minn. 2016
(requiring interpretation “as a whole” and in light of the context).
Harry Jerome Evans v. State of Minnesota 880 N.W.2d 357 Minn. 2016
Harry Jerome Evans v. State of Minnesota 880 N.W.2d 357 Minn. 2016
J.D. Donovan, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Transportation 878 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2016
J.D. Donovan, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Transportation 878 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2016
in the light of their context’ ” ()).
State of Minnesota v. Alonzo Crowder Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Alonzo Crowder Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of REICHMANN LAND AND CATTLE, LLP 867 N.W.2d 502 Minn. 2015
In the Matter of REICHMANN LAND AND CATTLE, LLP 867 N.W.2d 502 Minn. 2015
Co./Kok & Lundberg Funeral Homes, ().
State of Minnesota v. Brandon Wayne Riggs 865 N.W.2d 679 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Brandon Wayne Riggs 865 N.W.2d 679 Minn. 2015
(stating that “[mjultiple parts of a statute may be read together so as to ascertain whether the statute is ambiguous”); (“[W]e do not examine different provisions [of a statute] in isolation”).
Jolonda Rae Roberts v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jolonda Rae Roberts v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Alan Truelson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Alan Truelson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ronnie Lee Phillips Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Louis Steven Baratto Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Louis Steven Baratto Minn. Ct. App. 2014
3(b); d 643, 648-49 (Minn. 2011).
State of Minnesota v. Ronnie Lee Phillips Minn. Ct. App. 2014
3(b), do not apply when “an offender challenges the district court’s legal authority to award restitution.”
State of Minnesota v. George Alan Vanzee Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. George Alan Vanzee Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In State v. Gaiovnik, the supreme court held that the 30-day time limit does not apply under the “narrow circumstances” where the “only challenge is to the legal authority of the court to order restitution and that challenge was raised in the district court.” (emphasis added).
State of Minnesota v. Toby Earl Johnson 851 N.W.2d 60 Minn. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Toby Earl Johnson 851 N.W.2d 60 Minn. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Wayne Brian Christensen Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Wayne Brian Christensen Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Jaimiah Lamar Irby 848 N.W.2d 515 Minn. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Jaimiah Lamar Irby 848 N.W.2d 515 Minn. 2014
The constitutional avoidance canon requires that we avoid constitutional confrontations "if it is possible to do so.”
State v. Garcia-Gutierrez 844 N.W.2d 519 Minn. 2014
State v. Garcia-Gutierrez 844 N.W.2d 519 Minn. 2014
State v. Miller 842 N.W.2d 474 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Miller 842 N.W.2d 474 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(affirming restitution based on a felony conviction where victim did not make a restitution claim).
State v. Mayl 836 N.W.2d 368 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Mayl 836 N.W.2d 368 Minn. Ct. App. 2013