Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Johnson, 813 N.W.2d 1.

85 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Faith Annette Jenson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Faith Annette Jenson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
subject only to a few specifically established and well-delineated exceptions.’” (quoting Schneckloth v. 5 Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218, 219, 93 S. Ct. 2041, 2043 (1973) (quotation omitted)).
State of Minnesota v. David Ray Bennett 867 N.W.2d 539 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. David Ray Bennett 867 N.W.2d 539 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
The party challenging a statute on constitutional grounds must meet “the very heavy burden of demonstrating beyond a reasonable doubt that the statute is unconstitutional.” (quotation omitted).
Matthew Allan White v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Matthew Allan White v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
The party challenging a statute on constitutional grounds must meet “the very heavy burden of demonstrating beyond a reasonable doubt that the statute is unconstitutional.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Babafemi Adewale Odukale Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Babafemi Adewale Odukale Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“The party challenging the constitutionality of a statute bears the very heavy burden of 3 demonstrating beyond a reasonable doubt that the statute is unconstitutional.” (quotation omitted).
Antone William Guimont v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Antone William Guimont v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
The party challenging a statute on constitutional grounds must meet “the very heavy burden of demonstrating beyond a reasonable doubt that the statute is unconstitutional.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Amanda Nicole Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Amanda Nicole Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Rickford Rehmann Munger 858 N.W.2d 814 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Rickford Rehmann Munger 858 N.W.2d 814 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Brian Jeffrey Serber v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Leslie Jay Boyd, Jr. v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Leslie Jay Boyd, Jr. v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
A party challenging the constitutionality of a statute “bears the very heavy burden of demonstrating beyond a reasonable doubt that the statute is unconstitutional.” (quotation omitted).
Brian Jeffrey Serber v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2014
The party challenging a statute on constitutional grounds must meet “the very heavy burden of demonstrating beyond a 3 reasonable doubt that the statute is unconstitutional.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Terry Gene Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Terry Gene Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Melysa Kailyn Lau v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Ronald James Chasingbear Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Melysa Kailyn Lau v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2014
The party challenging a statute on constitutional grounds must meet “the very heavy burden of demonstrating beyond a reasonable doubt that the statute is unconstitutional.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Ronald James Chasingbear Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Ivan Ray Vaughan v. Wade Setter, Superintendant, Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension in his official capacity Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Rita Ann Stevens v. Commissioner of Public Safety 850 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Ivan Ray Vaughan v. Wade Setter, Superintendant, Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension in his official capacity Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Rita Ann Stevens v. Commissioner of Public Safety 850 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
The party challenging a statute on constitutional grounds must meet “the very heavy burden of demonstrating beyond a reasonable doubt that the statute is unconstitutional.” (quotation omitted).
In re Guardianship of Durand 845 N.W.2d 821 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re Guardianship of Durand 845 N.W.2d 821 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In reviewing the probate court’s equal protection finding, the threshold question “is whether the claimant is treated differently from others to whom the claimant is similarly situated in all relevant respects.”
Fosle v. Ritchie 824 N.W.2d 618 Minn. 2012
Fosle v. Ritchie 824 N.W.2d 618 Minn. 2012
In re the Welfare of M.L.M. 813 N.W.2d 26 Minn. 2012
In re the Welfare of M.L.M. 813 N.W.2d 26 Minn. 2012
State v. Mendoza 638 N.W.2d 480 Minn. Ct. App. 2002

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by