Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Beecroft, 813 N.W.2d 814.

160 citing documents.

State v. Ayala-Leyva 848 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Ayala-Leyva 848 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
The prosecution violates a defendant’s right to call witnesses and present a complete defense when the “interference with a witness’s decision to testify is substantial.” -40 (Minn.2012) (reversing murder conviction in interests of justice where prosecutor “threatened to withdraw support” from supervisor unless supervisor “barred” her assistant medical examiner from testifying as defense expert and examiner was not called because it was “understood” that it would be prohibited by h
State v. Vang 847 N.W.2d 248 Minn. 2014
Roman Nose v. State 845 N.W.2d 193 Minn. 2014
Roman Nose v. State 845 N.W.2d 193 Minn. 2014
State v. Castillo-Alvarez 836 N.W.2d 527 Minn. 2013
State v. Castillo-Alvarez 836 N.W.2d 527 Minn. 2013
State v. Hayes 831 N.W.2d 546 Minn. 2013
Chambers v. State 831 N.W.2d 311 Minn. 2013
State v. M.D.T. 831 N.W.2d 276 Minn. 2013