Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Leathers, 799 N.W.2d 606.
- Johnson v. State 820 N.W.2d 24 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
- Johnson v. State 820 N.W.2d 24 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
- State v. Grigsby 818 N.W.2d 511 Minn. 2012
- State v. Grigsby 818 N.W.2d 511 Minn. 2012
- State v. Ndikum 815 N.W.2d 816 Minn. 2012
- State v. Ndikum 815 N.W.2d 816 Minn. 2012
- LaMont v. Independent School District 728 814 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 2012
- LaMont v. Independent School District 728 814 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 2012
- Fannie Mae v. Heather Apartments Ltd. Partnership 811 N.W.2d 596 Minn. 2012
- Fannie Mae v. Heather Apartments Ltd. Partnership 811 N.W.2d 596 Minn. 2012
- State v. Fleck 810 N.W.2d 303 Minn. 2012
- State v. Fleck 810 N.W.2d 303 Minn. 2012
- State v. Hansen 805 N.W.2d 915 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
-
State v. Hansen
805 N.W.2d 915
Minn. Ct. App. 2011
This point of law has been more recently stated to require that when a penal statute is ambiguous, it must be “resolved in favor of the criminal defendant in the interest of lenity.”
- In re the Estate of Butler 803 N.W.2d 393 Minn. 2011
- In re the Estate of Butler 803 N.W.2d 393 Minn. 2011