Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Stagg v. Vintage Place Inc., 796 N.W.2d 312.
- Jeremy Tubbs, Relator v. Minnesota Department of Human Services, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- Mark M. Lazo, Relator v. Moguls F & B LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- Chaquita Broadway, Relator v. Minnesota State Agricultural Society-Minnesota State Fair, Island Therapeutic Massage Wellness Center, Department of Employment … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- Pamela Beidel, Relator v. Corporate Commission of Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe Indians - Grand Casino Hinckley, Department … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
Mark M. Lazo, Relator v. Moguls F & B LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(holding that relator was discharged for excessive absenteeism and tardiness when he failed to follow employer’s tardiness policy on at least five occasions).
- Chaquita Broadway, Relator v. Minnesota State Agricultural Society-Minnesota State Fair, Island Therapeutic Massage Wellness Center, Department of Employment … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
Pamela Beidel, Relator v. Corporate Commission of Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe Indians - Grand Casino Hinckley, Department …
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“Whether an employee engaged in conduct that disqualifies the employee from unemployment benefits is a mixed question of fact and law.” Stagg v. Vintage Place, Inc.
- Deborah Brakefield, Relator v. IND. School District 2889, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
Deborah Brakefield, Relator v. IND. School District 2889, Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“Whether an employee engaged in conduct that disqualifies the employee from unemployment benefits is a mixed question of fact and law.” (quotation omitted).
- Richard Hammerstad, Relator v. Princeton Auto Center, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
Richard Hammerstad, Relator v. Princeton Auto Center, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
3 fault of their own.” (quotations omitted); see Minn. Stat. §§ 268.03, subd.
- Cathy Justice, Relator v. Glacial Ridge Hospital, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- Cathy Justice, Relator v. Glacial Ridge Hospital, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- Jennie Rasmussen, Relator v. Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- Jennie Rasmussen, Relator v. Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- Steven Morris Smith, Relator v. Family Life Mental Health Center, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- Steven Morris Smith, Relator v. Family Life Mental Health Center, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- Michael Robin, Relator v. BHSI LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- Michael Robin, Relator v. BHSI LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- Andrew R. Patson, Relator v. Skaff Apartments, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
Andrew R. Patson, Relator v. Skaff Apartments, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
DECISION Appellate courts “will narrowly construe the disqualification provisions of the [unemployment-benefits] statute in light of their remedial nature, as well as the policy that unemployment compensation is paid only to those persons unemployed through no fault of their own.” (quotations omitted); see also Minn. Stat. §§ 268.03, subd.
- Icenhower v. Total Automotive, Inc. 845 N.W.2d 849 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
Icenhower v. Total Automotive, Inc.
845 N.W.2d 849
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Appellate courts “will narrowly construe the disqualification provisions of the statute in light of their remedial nature, as well as the policy that unemployment compensation is paid only to those persons unemployed through no fault of their own.” (quotations omitted); see also Minn.Stat.
- Van de Werken v. Bell & Howell, LLC 834 N.W.2d 220 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
-
Van de Werken v. Bell & Howell, LLC
834 N.W.2d 220
Minn. Ct. App. 2013
2 (2012); (citing policy that unemployment compensation is paid only to those who are unemployed through no fault of their own as well as remedial nature of statute); Irvine v. St.
- Hasledalen v. Department of Employment & Economic Development 811 N.W.2d 133 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
-
Hasledalen v. Department of Employment & Economic Development
811 N.W.2d 133
Minn. Ct. App. 2012
We review the ULJ’s findings in the light most favorable to the decision and will not reverse if there is “evidence in the record that reasonably tends to sustain them.” Stagg v. Vintage Place, Inc.
- Cunningham v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. 809 N.W.2d 231 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
- Cunningham v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. 809 N.W.2d 231 Minn. Ct. App. 2011