Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Dillon v. State, 781 N.W.2d 588.

153 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Krystal Elizabeth Alwin Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Krystal Elizabeth Alwin Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
State of Minnesota v. Jacob Miles Solberg 869 N.W.2d 66 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jacob Miles Solberg 869 N.W.2d 66 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
d 588, 595 (Minn. App. 2010), review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
State of Minnesota v. Larry Darnell Lakes Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Larry Darnell Lakes Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jackson, d at 357; review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010); review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota v. Jack Arnold Haines Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jack Arnold Haines Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Review of a district court’s decision whether to depart from the guideline sentence when there is a proper basis for departure is “extremely deferential.” -96 (Minn. App. 2010), review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
State of Minnesota v. Raheem Michael Kemokai Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Raheem Michael Kemokai Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
State of Minnesota v. Julian Sanchez-Sanchez Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Julian Sanchez-Sanchez Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
State of Minnesota v. Miranda Catherine Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Miranda Catherine Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Review of the district court’s decision on whether to depart, based on identified and proper grounds, is “extremely deferential.” d 588, 595-96 (Minn. App. 2010), review denied (Minn. 20 July 2010).
State of Minnesota v. Jared Armand Cobb Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jared Armand Cobb Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
State of Minnesota v. Wayne William Leistico Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Wayne William Leistico Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“Even a single aggravating factor may justify a departure.” review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
State of Minnesota v. President Pimping Austin Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Rafael Antonio Alfaro Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Rafael Antonio Alfaro Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
State of Minnesota v. President Pimping Austin Minn. Ct. App. 2014
We review de novo “whether a valid departure ground exists, relying on the factual findings that support the decision,” and “whether the valid departure reasons are severe,” review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
State of Minnesota v. David Eugene Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. David Eugene Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
But “[w]hile courts usually should restrict sentences to double departures, when severe aggravating factors are present[,] the only limit is the maximum sentence provided by the legislature.” review denied (Minn. June 19, 1996); -99 (Minn. App. 2010), review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010) (greater- than-double departure justified where severe aggravating factors present); & n.1 (Minn. 1987) (providing that only in cases of “severe aggravating circumstances” may the district court impose a gre
State of Minnesota v. Robert John Meyers 853 N.W.2d 819 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. David John Ojeda Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. David John Ojeda Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
State of Minnesota v. Robert John Meyers 853 N.W.2d 819 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
State of Minnesota v. David Edward Westgard Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Steven Pettinelli Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. David Edward Westgard Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Steven Pettinelli Minn. Ct. App. 2014
–96 (Minn. App. 2010) (stating that “we have found no case in which this court or the supreme court has overturned a district court’s decision to depart .
Ronald James Kettle v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Ronald James Kettle v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“[P]articular cruelty involves the gratuitous infliction of pain and cruelty of a kind not usually associated with the commission of the offense in question.” Rourke, d at 922 (quotations omitted); d 588, 601 (Minn. App. 2010) (stating that “victim injuries have been relied on in multiple 9 departure cases” and that victim injury may be “a useful indicator of the degree of brutality involved”), review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010); Volk, d at 366 (stating that
State of Minnesota v. Jermaine Octavious Stansberry Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Jermaine Octavious Stansberry Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-95 (Minn. App. 2010), review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
David Laurence Hodges v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
David Laurence Hodges v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(stating that when imposing an upward departure “a court generally should not increase a sentence’s length beyond twice the presumptive sentence,” but noting that “there may well be rare cases in which the facts are so unusually compelling that an even greater degree of departure will be jus
State v. Ayala-Leyva 848 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Ayala-Leyva 848 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010)
State v. Hicks 837 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Hicks 837 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
State v. Turrubiates 830 N.W.2d 173 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Turrubiates 830 N.W.2d 173 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
“A sentence within the sentencing guidelines range is presumed appropriate.” (citing Minn. Sent.
State v. Castillo-Alvarez 820 N.W.2d 601 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
State v. Castillo-Alvarez 820 N.W.2d 601 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
review denied (July 20, 2010).
State v. Robideau 817 N.W.2d 180 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
State v. Robideau 817 N.W.2d 180 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
State v. Hahn 799 N.W.2d 25 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Weaver 796 N.W.2d 561 Minn. Ct. App. 2011