Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Thompson, 788 N.W.2d 485.

56 citing documents.

State v. Barajas 817 N.W.2d 204 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
State v. Barajas 817 N.W.2d 204 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
The constitutional right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures protects what a person “ ‘seeks to preserve as private, even in an area accessible to the public.’ ” (Page, J., concurring) (quoting Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347, 351-52 , 88 S.Ct.
State v. Beecroft 813 N.W.2d 814 Minn. 2012
State v. Beecroft 813 N.W.2d 814 Minn. 2012
A determination that a “statement is involuntary within the meaning of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment necessitates a finding that the statement was coerced.”
State v. Vue 797 N.W.2d 5 Minn. 2011
State v. Vue 797 N.W.2d 5 Minn. 2011
“An interrogation is custodial if, based on all the surrounding circumstances, a reasonable person under the circumstances would *11 believe that he or she was in police custody of the degree associated with formal arrest.” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted); Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420, 442 , 104 S.Ct.