Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Diede, 795 N.W.2d 836.

585 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Chad Michael Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Scott Marshall Karo v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. La�Rog Daquan Meadows Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“The United States and Minnesota Constitutions protect ‘[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.’” (quoting U.S. Const. amend.
State of Minnesota v. Chad Michael Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Scott Marshall Karo v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218, 222, 93 S. Ct. 2041, 2045 (1973)
Richard Allen Gumphrey v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Nicolas Wilcox Hult v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Steven Paul Scheiterlein v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Darreon Jonye Harding Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Richard Allen Gumphrey v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2014
3 (Minn. 2011); see Johnson v. Comm’r of Pub.
State of Minnesota v. Darreon Jonye Harding Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Steven Paul Scheiterlein v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218, 219, 93 S. Ct. 2041, 2043-44 (1973)
Nicolas Wilcox Hult v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218, 219, 93 S. Ct. 2041, 2043–44 (1973)
In re the Welfare of B.A.H. 845 N.W.2d 158 Minn. 2014
In re the Welfare of B.A.H. 845 N.W.2d 158 Minn. 2014
4, superseded the Lothenbach procedure in the adult criminal context, , 842 n. 2 (Minn.2011), the rule does not apply in juvenile cases.
State v. Lemert 843 N.W.2d 227 Minn. 2014
State v. Lemert 843 N.W.2d 227 Minn. 2014
State v. Eichers 840 N.W.2d 210 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Eichers 840 N.W.2d 210 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
But “[t]he reasonable-suspicion standard is not high” and “is less demanding than the standard for probable cause or a preponderance of the evidence.” (quotations omitted).
Hoekstra v. Commissioner of Public Safety 839 N.W.2d 536 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Hoekstra v. Commissioner of Public Safety 839 N.W.2d 536 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
ANALYSIS “The United States and Minnesota Constitutions protect ‘[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.’ ” (quoting U.S. Const, amend.
State v. Brooks 838 N.W.2d 563 Minn. 2013
State v. Brooks 838 N.W.2d 563 Minn. 2013
State v. Milton 821 N.W.2d 789 Minn. 2012
State v. Milton 821 N.W.2d 789 Minn. 2012
State v. Barajas 817 N.W.2d 204 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
State v. Barajas 817 N.W.2d 204 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
State v. Smith 814 N.W.2d 346 Minn. 2012
State v. Smith 814 N.W.2d 346 Minn. 2012
State v. Heaton 812 N.W.2d 904 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
State v. Heaton 812 N.W.2d 904 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Anderson, d at 138 (quotation omitted); (holding that mere association with suspected drug dealer, including driving dealer’s car, did not provide reasonable basis to suspect person may be armed and dangerous).
In re Disciplinary Action Against Nathanson 812 N.W.2d 70 Minn. 2012
In re Disciplinary Action Against Nathanson 812 N.W.2d 70 Minn. 2012
State v. Prtine 799 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 2011
State v. Prtine 799 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 2011