Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Francis v. State, 781 N.W.2d 892.

64 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Ahavel Abimbola Scherz Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Dobbins, d at 731; (noting that whether to cross-examine state’s expert witness was trial strategy); (“Decisions about objections at trial are matters of trial strategy.”).
Jeremy John Huey v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Jeremy John Huey v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In doing so, we review questions of law de novo and findings of fact for an abuse of discretion.”
State v. Nicks 831 N.W.2d 493 Minn. 2013
Francis v. State 829 N.W.2d 415 Minn. 2013
Francis v. State 829 N.W.2d 415 Minn. 2013
Francis v. State (Francis II)
Andersen v. State 830 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2013
Andersen v. State 830 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2013
539 n. 10 (Minn.2012) (noting that decisions about which witnesses to interview are typically matters of trial strategy that we will not review); (noting that whether to cross-examine the State’s expert witness constitutes trial strategy); Bobo, d at 138-39 ; (“When determining whether alleged failure to investigate constitutes ineffective assistance of counsel, we consider whether the d
Dereje v. State 812 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Dereje v. State 812 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
State v. Petersen 799 N.W.2d 653 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Petersen 799 N.W.2d 653 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Sanders v. State 791 N.W.2d 126 Minn. 2010
Sanders v. State 791 N.W.2d 126 Minn. 2010