Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Valentine, 787 N.W.2d 630.

126 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Eddie Niles Hubbard Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Eddie Niles Hubbard Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Under 23 Minn. Stat. § 634.20, “evidence showing how a defendant treats his family or household members, such as his former spouses or other girlfriends sheds light on how the defendant interacts with those close to him, which in turn suggests how the defendant may interact with the victim.” review denied (Minn. Nov.
State of Minnesota v. Larry Maurice Taylor Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Larry Maurice Taylor Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Nov.
State of Minnesota v. Yuri Alexander Taylor Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Yuri Alexander Taylor Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(holding that Minn. Stat. § 634.20 (2008) authorized the admission of evidence of domestic abuse against an ex-girlfriend), review denied (Minn. Nov.
State of Minnesota v. Eric John Henderson-Bey Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Eric John Henderson-Bey Minn. Ct. App. 2015
We have clarified that “section 634.20 authorizes the admission of evidence of domestic abuse against appellant’s family or household members.” review denied, (Minn. Nov.
State of Minnesota v. Donald James Helps Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Donald James Helps Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Timothy Alvis Gayles, Sr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Timothy Alvis Gayles, Sr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
But, the probative value of such evidence is high because “evidence showing how a defendant treats his family or household members, such as his former spouses or other girlfriends, sheds light on how the defendant interacts with those close to him, which in turn suggests how the defendant may interact with the victim.” review denied (Minn. Nov.
State of Minnesota v. Michael Antwon Common Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Michael Antwon Common Minn. Ct. App. 2014
DECISION Common first argues that violation of a DANCO is not “similar conduct” as defined by Minn. Stat. § 634.20 (2012).1 “Because this issue turns on statutory interpretation, it is reviewed de novo.”
State of Minnesota v. Michael Darron Ware Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Michael Darron Ware Minn. Ct. App. 2014
15 Six years later, this court held that “section 634.20 authorizes the admission of evidence of domestic abuse against [an accused’s] family or household members.” review denied (Minn. Nov.
State of Minnesota v. Karen Marie O�Farrell Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Kevin Lee Savoie, Sr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Kevin Lee Savoie, Sr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
21, 1986); (explaining that testimony that officer knows defendant from prior contacts “is error if the defendant’s identity is not an issue in the case”), review denied (Minn. Nov.
State of Minnesota v. Karen Marie O�Farrell Minn. Ct. App. 2014
v. Valentine, (-41 (Minn. 2000)), review denied (Minn. Nov.
State of Minnesota v. Mannie Lamar Banks Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Mannie Lamar Banks Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. LaQuinn Jamul Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. LaQuinn Jamul Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-37 (Minn. App. 4 2010) (rejecting the appellant’s argument that “other family or household members” refers to those of the victim), review denied (Minn. Nov.
State of Minnesota v. Earvin Ainwin Wright Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Earvin Ainwin Wright Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Six years later, review denied (Minn. Nov.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by