Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In re Disciplinary Action Against Coleman, 793 N.W.2d 296.

118 citing documents.

In re Disciplinary Action Against Voss 830 N.W.2d 867 Minn. 2013
In re Disciplinary Action Against Voss 830 N.W.2d 867 Minn. 2013
In re Disciplinary Action Against Fru 829 N.W.2d 379 Minn. 2013
In re Disciplinary Action Against Fru 829 N.W.2d 379 Minn. 2013
C. Harm to the Public and Legal Profession In assessing the harm that Fru’s misconduct caused to the public and the legal profession, we consider “ ‘the number of clients harmed [and] the extent of the clients’ injuries.’ ” ().
In re Disciplinary Action Against Nathanson 812 N.W.2d 70 Minn. 2012
In re Disciplinary Action Against Nathanson 812 N.W.2d 70 Minn. 2012
C.'Harm to the Public and to the Legal Profession “The impact of the harm to the public and the profession requires consideration of the number of clients harmed and the extent of the clients’ injuries.” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).
In re Disciplinary Action Against Paul 809 N.W.2d 693 Minn. 2012
In re Disciplinary Action Against Paul 809 N.W.2d 693 Minn. 2012
In re Disciplinary Action Against Rymanowski 809 N.W.2d 217 Minn. 2012
In re Disciplinary Action Against Rymanowski 809 N.W.2d 217 Minn. 2012
Harm to the Public and Legal Profession When determining whether an attorney's misconduct harmed the public and legal profession, we consider " 'the number of clients harmed [and] the extent of the clients' injuries"" ().
In re Disciplinary Action Against Fairbairn 802 N.W.2d 734 Minn. 2011
In re Disciplinary Action Against Fairbairn 802 N.W.2d 734 Minn. 2011
In re Disciplinary Action Against Ulanowski 800 N.W.2d 785 Minn. 2011
In re Disciplinary Action Against Ulanowski 800 N.W.2d 785 Minn. 2011
State v. Prtine 799 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 2011
State v. Prtine 799 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 2011
(stating that factual findings will not be reversed “if they have eviden-tiary support in the record and are not clearly erroneous” and that findings of fact are clearly erroneous when an appellate court “is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made” (citations omitted) (
In re Disciplinary Action Against Swokowski 796 N.W.2d 317 Minn. 2011
In re Disciplinary Action Against Swokowski 796 N.W.2d 317 Minn. 2011
Harm to the Public and the Legal Profession In evaluating the impact of the harm caused by professional misconduct to the public and the profession, we consider “ ‘the number of clients harmed [and] the extent of the clients’ injuries.’” , (Minn.2011) ().