Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hohmann v. Commissioner of Revenue, 781 N.W.2d 156.

32 citing documents.

Theodore Lockhart, Sr., Relator v. Hennepin County Minn. 2026
Theodore Lockhart, Sr., Relator v. Hennepin County Minn. 2026
(quoting Hohmann v. Comm’r of Revenue, d 156, 157 (Minn. 2010)); Minn Stat. § 271.10, subd.
E. I. duPont de Nemours and Company & Subsidiaries, Relator v. Commissioner of Revenue Minn. 2025
E. I. duPont de Nemours and Company & Subsidiaries, Relator v. Commissioner of Revenue Minn. 2025
12 error of law.” Hohmann v. Comm’r of Revenue, see also Minn. Stat. § 271.10, subd.
Angeline R. Brozovich and Frank V. Brozovich, Relators, vs. Commissioner of Revenue, Respondent Minn. 2025
Angeline R. Brozovich and Frank V. Brozovich, Relators, vs. Commissioner of Revenue, Respondent Minn. 2025
“We review tax court decisions to determine whether the tax court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, whether the tax court’s decision is supported by evidence in the record, and whether the tax court made an error of law.” Hohmann v. Comm’r of Revenue
Appellant, vs. Minn. 2023
Our review is limited and deferential; we consider “whether the tax court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, whether the tax court’s decision is supported by evidence in the record, and whether the tax court made an error of law.” Hohmann v. Comm’r of Revenue
Enterprise Leasing Company of Minnesota, Minn. 2023
We consider “whether the tax court lacked subjec t matter jurisdiction, whether the tax court's decision is supported by evidence in the record, and whether the tax court made an error of law.” Hohmann v. Comm’r of Revenue
Comm'r of Revenue v. Enbridge Energy, LP 923 N.W.2d 17 Minn. 2019
Comm'r of Revenue v. Enbridge Energy, LP 923 N.W.2d 17 Minn. 2019
Hohmann v. Comm'r of Revenue , , 157 (Minn. 2010).
Johnson v. Cnty. of Hennepin 915 N.W.2d 889 Minn. 2018
Johnson v. Cnty. of Hennepin 915 N.W.2d 889 Minn. 2018
Hohmann v. Comm'r of Revenue , , 157 (Minn. 2010).
Lake Country Power Coop. v. Comm'r of Revenue 916 N.W.2d 863 Minn. 2018
Lake Country Power Coop. v. Comm'r of Revenue 916 N.W.2d 863 Minn. 2018
Hohmann v. Comm'r of Revenue , , 157 (Minn. 2010) ; Langer v. Comm'r of Revenue , , 80 (Minn. 2009).
A17-1479 A17-1481 Minn. 2018
Hohmann v. Comm’r of Revenue, Langer v. Comm’r of Revenue
Associated Bank, N.A. v. Comm'r of Revenue 914 N.W.2d 394 Minn. 2018
Associated Bank, N.A. v. Comm'r of Revenue 914 N.W.2d 394 Minn. 2018
Hohmann v. Comm'r of Revenue , , 157 (Minn. 2010) ; see Minn. Stat. § 271.10 , subd.
Johnson v. County of Hennepin 903 N.W.2d 422 Minn. 2017
Johnson v. County of Hennepin 903 N.W.2d 422 Minn. 2017
Specifically, we “review tax court decisions to determine whether the tax court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, whether the tax court’s decision is supported by evidence in the record, and whether the tax court made an error of law.” Hohmann v. Comm’r of Revenue
Minnesota Energy Resources Corporation, Relator v. Commissioner of Revenue, Commissioner of Revenue, Relator v. Minnesota Energy Resources Corporation, … 886 N.W.2d 786 Minn. 2016
Minnesota Energy Resources Corporation, Relator v. Commissioner of Revenue, Commissioner of Revenue, Relator v. Minnesota Energy Resources Corporation, … 886 N.W.2d 786 Minn. 2016
Specifically, “[w]e review tax court decisions to determine whether the tax court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, whether the tax court’s decision is supported by the evidence in the record, and whether the tax court made an error of law.” Hohmann v. Comm’r of Revenue
Connexus Energy, Relators v. Commissioner of Revenue 868 N.W.2d 234 Minn. 2015
In reviewing a tax court decision, we determine whether the “tax court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, whether the tax court’s decision is supported by the evidence in the record, and whether the tax court made an error of law.” Hohmann 5 v. Comm’r of Revenue
Soyka v. Commissioner of Revenue 842 N.W.2d 682 Minn. 2014
Soyka v. Commissioner of Revenue 842 N.W.2d 682 Minn. 2014
‘We review tax court decisions to determine whether the tax court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, whether the tax court’s decision is supported by evidence in the record, and whether the tax court made an error of law.” Hohmann v. Comm’r of Revenue
Turner v. Commissioner of Revenue 840 N.W.2d 205 Minn. 2013
Turner v. Commissioner of Revenue 840 N.W.2d 205 Minn. 2013
deprives that court of subject matter jurisdiction.” Hohmann v. Comm’r of Revenue
Soyka v. Commissioner of Revenue 834 N.W.2d 711 Minn. 2013
Soyka v. Commissioner of Revenue 834 N.W.2d 711 Minn. 2013
“We review tax court decisions to determine whether the tax court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, whether the tax court’s decision is supported by evidence in the record, and whether the tax court made an error of law.” Hohmann v. Comm’r of Revenue
Frederick Farms, Inc. v. County of Olmsted 801 N.W.2d 167 Minn. 2011
Frederick Farms, Inc. v. County of Olmsted 801 N.W.2d 167 Minn. 2011
We review tax court decisions “to determine whether the tax court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, whether the tax court’s decision is supported by evidence in the record, and whether the tax court made an error of law.” Hohmann v. Comm’r of Revenue
Marlow Timberland, LLC v. County of Lake 800 N.W.2d 637 Minn. 2011
Marlow Timberland, LLC v. County of Lake 800 N.W.2d 637 Minn. 2011
1 (2010); Hohmann v. Comm’r of Revenue, *640