Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Driscoll v. STANDARD HARDWARE, INC., 785 N.W.2d 805.

16 citing documents.

JHP 2309 Lyndale, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Appellate courts review de novo “whether a genuine issue of material fact exists and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” Driscoll v. Standard Hardware, Inc., d 805, 810 (Minn. App. 2010) (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
Progressive Preferred Insurance Company, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Minnesota law is clear that “causation in a breach-of- warranty case presents a factual issue.” Driscoll v. Standard Hardware, Inc., d 805, 816 (Minn. App. 2010), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In re: the Matter of the Le Duc Living Trust. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
See Richfield Bank & Driscoll v. Standard Hardware, Inc., rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Driscoll v. Standard Hardware, Inc., rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
RSS Fridley, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
And Minnesota courts “have been reluctant to impose a duty to disclose material facts in arm’s-length business transactions between commercial entities.” Driscoll v. Standard Hardware, Inc. , (M inn.
ARF, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See Lobe Enters., d at 372 -73 (affirming dismissal of fraud claim brought by plaintiff-purchaser where plaintiff failed to introduce any evidence of damages arising from installation of new roof on apartment building); see also Driscoll v. Standard Hardware, Inc., (affirming summary judgment in defendant’s favor on plaintiff’s fraud claim where plaintiff “presented no evidence” of damages), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Steve Dupuis, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Look ing specifically at commercial entities, “[c]ourts applying Minnesota law have been reluctant to impose a duty to disclose material facts in arm’s-length transactions.” review denied (Minn. Sept.
George Lanoue, et al., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Driscoll v. Standard Hardware, Inc., (causation is an essential element of an implied warranty claim), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Regents of the University of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Looking specifically at commercial entities , “[c]ourts applying Minnesota law have been reluctant to impose a duty to disclose material facts in arm ’s-length business transactions .” review denied (Minn. Sept.
BPG Grand Oak Building Retail Investors, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Minnesota courts have been “reluctant to impose a duty to disclose material facts in arm’s -length business transactions between commercial entities.” Driscoll v. Standard Hardware, Inc. , review denied (Minn. Sept.
CSM Equities, LLC v. Woodland Village Investments Limited Partnership Minn. Ct. App. 2016
CSM Equities, LLC v. Woodland Village Investments Limited Partnership Minn. Ct. App. 2016
If a party conceals these facts, knowing that the other party acts on the presumption that no such facts exist, nondisclosure may constitute fraud.” Driscoll v. Standard Hardware, Inc., (alteration omitted) (quotations and citation omitted), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Ezell Moore, individually and as trustee for the heirs of Valerie M. VanMieghem, Decedent v. CenterPoint Energy Resources … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Ezell Moore, individually and as trustee for the heirs of Valerie M. VanMieghem, Decedent v. CenterPoint Energy Resources … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Driscoll v. Standard Hardware, Inc., review denied (Minn. Sept.
Robert R Elliott, individually, and as trustee of the Robert R. Elliott Revocable Trust and the Elliott Mandelheim … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Robert R Elliott, individually, and as trustee of the Robert R. Elliott Revocable Trust and the Elliott Mandelheim … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“[C]ausation in a breach-of-warranty case presents a factual issue.” Driscoll v. Standard Hardware, Inc., review denied (Minn. Sept.