Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Pratt, 813 N.W.2d 868.
- State of Minnesota v. Abdullahi Jimale Jama Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Abdullahi Jimale Jama Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Michael William Schneider Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Michael William Schneider Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- Daniel Peter Frisch v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
Daniel Peter Frisch v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
reasonably support the jury’s conclusion that the defendant was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.”
- State v. Pederson 840 N.W.2d 433 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
- State v. Pederson 840 N.W.2d 433 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
- State v. Hicks 837 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
- State v. Hicks 837 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
- State v. Munt 831 N.W.2d 569 Minn. 2013
-
State v. Munt
831 N.W.2d 569
Minn. 2013
-79 (Minn.2012)(involving a retired judge retained by the prosecution as an expert in an unrelated civil case who presided over a criminal defendant’s trial prosecuted by the same prosecuting authority); -69 (Minn.2009)(involving a trial judge engaged in ex parte communication