Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Petersen, 799 N.W.2d 653.

27 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See State v. Beecroft , State v. Petersen , rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
-660 (Minn. App. 2011), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(stating that an argument that is not raised in a principal brief on appeal is waived), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Brian William Meger Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Distinguished State of Minnesota v. Brian William Meger Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Issues not raised or argued in appellant’s [principal] brief cannot be revived in a reply brief.” review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Omar Taha Yaseen Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Omar Taha Yaseen Minn. Ct. App. 2016
4 DECISION I. Postconviction relief “When a defendant initially files a direct appeal and then moves for a stay to pursue postconviction relief, we review the postconviction court’s decisions using the same standard that we apply on direct appeal.” review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Casey James Pederson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Casey James Pederson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
DECISION “When a defendant initially files a direct appeal and then moves for a stay to pursue postconviction relief, we review the postconviction court’s decisions using the same standard that we apply on direct appeal.” review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Virginia Marie Carlson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Philip Lee Carlson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Virginia Marie Carlson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Issues not raised or argued in appellant’s [principal] brief cannot be revived in a reply brief.” (), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Philip Lee Carlson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Issues not raised or argued in appellant’s [principal] brief cannot be revived in a reply brief.” (), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Taylor Rod Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Taylor Rod Minn. Ct. App. 2016
he element of intent”); Barnslater, d at 914–15 (concluding that adequate factual basis supported guilty plea to first-degree burglary, reasoning in part that defendant’s intent to damage property—an element of the predicate offense—could be inferred from his admission that he “thr[e]w some stuff around” in manner that could have caused damage (quotation omitted)); d 653, 658 (Minn. App. 2011) (concluding that adequate factual basis supported guilty plea to second-degree intentional murder, reas
Jeremy Shane Zimmermann v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jeremy Shane Zimmermann v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(stating that an argument raised for the first time on appeal from a denial of postconviction relief is waived); (stating that an argument that is not raised in a principal brief on appeal is waived and may not be revived in a reply brief), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Javonate James McNeal Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Javonate James McNeal Minn. Ct. App. 2015
−60 (Minn. App. 2011) (citing State v. O’Brien, and upholding upward-departure sentence when “at least one of the aggravating circumstances stated by the district court [wa]s supported by the record”), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Rafael Antonio Alfaro Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Rafael Antonio Alfaro Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(citing State v. O’Brien, d 525, 527 (Minn. 1985), and upholding upward-departure sentence when “at least one of the aggravating circumstances stated by the district court [was] supported by the record”), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Raul Perez Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Raul Perez Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(“A reviewing court examines the record to determine if the reasons given by the district court justify the departure.” (emphasis added)), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Marquin Lamont Craig Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Marquin Lamont Craig Minn. Ct. App. 2014
DECISION “When a defendant initially files a direct appeal and then moves for a stay to pursue postconviction relief, we review the postconviction court’s decisions using the same standard that we apply on direct appeal.” review denied (Minn. Sept.
State v. Rushton 820 N.W.2d 287 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
State v. Rushton 820 N.W.2d 287 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Misquadace, d at 71 ; (applying Misquadace), review denied (Minn. Sept.