Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Park Nicollet Clinic v. Hamann, 808 N.W.2d 828.

137 citing documents.

Yvette Ford v. Minneapolis Public Schools 874 N.W.2d 231 Minn. 2016
Soderberg & Vail, LLC v. Meshbesher & Spence, Ltd. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Soderberg & Vail, LLC v. Meshbesher & Spence, Ltd. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“To state a claim for promissory estoppel, the plaintiff must show that (1) there was a clear and definite promise, (2) the promisor intended to induce reliance and such reliance occurred, and (3) the promise must be enforced to prevent injustice.”
Teresa McDonald v. Allina Health System d/b/a United Hospital Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Teresa McDonald v. Allina Health System d/b/a United Hospital Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“The statute of limitations begins to run on a claim when ‘the cause of action accrues.’” (quoting Minn. Stat. § 541.01 (2010)).
Alan Klapmeier v. Cirrus Industries, Inc., Cirrus Holding Company, Ltd. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Alan Klapmeier v. Cirrus Industries, Inc., Cirrus Holding Company, Ltd. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Todd Anderson v. Patricia Lloyd Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Todd Anderson v. Patricia Lloyd Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“To state a claim for promissory estoppel, the plaintiff must show that (1) there was a clear and definite promise, (2) the promisor intended to induce reliance and such reliance occurred, and (3) the promise must be enforced to prevent injustice.”
State of Minnesota by Lorie Afremov and Michael R. Afremov v. Anne L. Remes, et al., Martha W. … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota by Lorie Afremov and Michael R. Afremov v. Anne L. Remes, et al., Martha W. … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“A cause of action accrues when the elements of the action have occurred, such that the cause of action could be brought and would survive a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.”
Margaret Burrell Hall, successor in interest to Robert L. Hall, decedent v. Barbara Jeanne Hall f/k/a Barbara Jeanne … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Margaret Burrell Hall, successor in interest to Robert L. Hall, decedent v. Barbara Jeanne Hall f/k/a Barbara Jeanne … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(explaining that “[a] cause of action accrues when all of the elements of the action have occurred, such that the cause of action could be brought and would survive a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim”).
20/20 Group, Inc. d/b/a Opportunities in Business v. Hydeaway II, LLC, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2015
20/20 Group, Inc. d/b/a Opportunities in Business v. Hydeaway II, LLC, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2015
6 contract by defendant.”
Patrick Finn and Lighthouse Management Group, Inc., Appellants/Cross-Respondents v. Alliance Bank, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, Home Federal Bank, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, KleinBank, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, … 860 N.W.2d 638 Minn. 2015
Patrick Finn and Lighthouse Management Group, Inc., Appellants/Cross-Respondents v. Alliance Bank, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, Home Federal Bank, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, KleinBank, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, … 860 N.W.2d 638 Minn. 2015
P. 12.02(e), we consider “only the facts alleged in the complaint, accepting those facts as 27 true and must construe all reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmoving party.” Gretsch v. Vantium Capital, Inc., ().
David Dennis Schroer v. Thomas Redmond, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2015
David Dennis Schroer v. Thomas Redmond, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Medical Staff of Avera Marshall Regional Medical Center on its Own behalf and in its Representative Capacity for … 857 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 2014
Medical Staff of Avera Marshall Regional Medical Center on its Own behalf and in its Representative Capacity for … 857 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 2014
Fieseler Masonry, Inc. v. City of Mabel, et al., Exact Construction Company, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Fieseler Masonry, Inc. v. City of Mabel, et al., Exact Construction Company, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“[T]o state a claim for breach of contract, the plaintiff must show (1) formation of a contract, (2) performance by plaintiff of any conditions precedent to his right to demand performance by the defendant, and (3) breach of the contract by defendant.”
Laura L. Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A. 851 N.W.2d 598 Minn. 2014
Laura L. Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A. 851 N.W.2d 598 Minn. 2014
Lyon Financial Services, Incorporated, d/b/a U.S. Bancorp Business Equipment Finance Group v. Illinois Paper and Copier Company 848 N.W.2d 539 Minn. 2014
Lyon Financial Services, Incorporated, d/b/a U.S. Bancorp Business Equipment Finance Group v. Illinois Paper and Copier Company 848 N.W.2d 539 Minn. 2014
The elements of a breach of contract claim are “(1) formation of a contract, (2) performance by plaintiff of any conditions precedent to his right to demand performance by the defendant, and (3) breach of the contract by defendant.” (citing Briggs Transp.
Gretsch v. Vantium Capital, Inc. 846 N.W.2d 424 Minn. 2014
Gretsch v. Vantium Capital, Inc. 846 N.W.2d 424 Minn. 2014
Finally, in reviewing the district court’s dismissal of the complaint, we consider “only the facts alleged in the complaint, accepting those facts as true and must construe all reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmoving party.” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).
Finn v. Alliance Bank 838 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Finn v. Alliance Bank 838 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
An appellate court reviews the “construction and application of a statute of limitations, including the law governing the accrual of a cause of action, de novo.” (quotation omitted).
Sipe v. STS Manufacturing, Inc. 834 N.W.2d 683 Minn. 2013
Sipe v. STS Manufacturing, Inc. 834 N.W.2d 683 Minn. 2013
We review de novo the “construction and application of a statute of limitations, including the law governing the accrual of a cause of action.” (internal quotation marks omitted).
Weavewood, Inc. v. S & P Home Investments, LLC 821 N.W.2d 576 Minn. 2012
Weavewood, Inc. v. S & P Home Investments, LLC 821 N.W.2d 576 Minn. 2012
We review de novo the district court’s grant of summary judgment to S & (explaining that the application of statutes of limitations is reviewed de novo).
Sipe v. STS Manufacturing, Inc. 822 N.W.2d 2 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Sipe v. STS Manufacturing, Inc. 822 N.W.2d 2 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Appellate courts review de novo “the construction and application of a statute of limitations, including the law governing the accrual of a cause of action,” and “the grant of a motion to dismiss.” ' (quotation omitted).