Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Park Nicollet Clinic v. Hamann, 808 N.W.2d 828.
- Soderberg & Vail, LLC v. Meshbesher & Spence, Ltd. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
Soderberg & Vail, LLC v. Meshbesher & Spence, Ltd.
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“To state a claim for promissory estoppel, the plaintiff must show that (1) there was a clear and definite promise, (2) the promisor intended to induce reliance and such reliance occurred, and (3) the promise must be enforced to prevent injustice.”
- Teresa McDonald v. Allina Health System d/b/a United Hospital Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
Teresa McDonald v. Allina Health System d/b/a United Hospital
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“The statute of limitations begins to run on a claim when ‘the cause of action accrues.’” (quoting Minn. Stat. § 541.01 (2010)).
- Alan Klapmeier v. Cirrus Industries, Inc., Cirrus Holding Company, Ltd. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- Alan Klapmeier v. Cirrus Industries, Inc., Cirrus Holding Company, Ltd. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- Todd Anderson v. Patricia Lloyd Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
Todd Anderson v. Patricia Lloyd
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“To state a claim for promissory estoppel, the plaintiff must show that (1) there was a clear and definite promise, (2) the promisor intended to induce reliance and such reliance occurred, and (3) the promise must be enforced to prevent injustice.”
- State of Minnesota by Lorie Afremov and Michael R. Afremov v. Anne L. Remes, Martha W. Gabbert Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
State of Minnesota by Lorie Afremov and Michael R. Afremov v. Anne L. Remes, Martha W. Gabbert
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“A cause of action accrues when the elements of the action have occurred, such that the cause of action could be brought and would survive a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.”
- Margaret Burrell Hall, successor in interest to Robert L. Hall, decedent v. Barbara Jeanne Hall f/k/a Barbara Jeanne … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
Margaret Burrell Hall, successor in interest to Robert L. Hall, decedent v. Barbara Jeanne Hall f/k/a Barbara Jeanne …
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(explaining that “[a] cause of action accrues when all of the elements of the action have occurred, such that the cause of action could be brought and would survive a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim”).
- 20/20 Group, Inc. d/b/a Opportunities in Business v. Hydeaway II, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
20/20 Group, Inc. d/b/a Opportunities in Business v. Hydeaway II, LLC
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
6 contract by defendant.”
- Patrick Finn and Lighthouse Management Group, Inc., Appellants/Cross-Respondents v. Alliance Bank, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, Home Federal Bank, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, KleinBank, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, … 860 N.W.2d 638 Minn. 2015
-
Patrick Finn and Lighthouse Management Group, Inc., Appellants/Cross-Respondents v. Alliance Bank, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, Home Federal Bank, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, KleinBank, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, …
860 N.W.2d 638
Minn. 2015
P. 12.02(e), we consider “only the facts alleged in the complaint, accepting those facts as 27 true and must construe all reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmoving party.” Gretsch v. Vantium Capital, Inc., ().
- David Dennis Schroer v. Thomas Redmond Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- David Dennis Schroer v. Thomas Redmond Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- Medical Staff of Avera Marshall Regional Medical Center on its Own behalf and in its Representative Capacity for … 857 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 2014
- Medical Staff of Avera Marshall Regional Medical Center on its Own behalf and in its Representative Capacity for … 857 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 2014
- Fieseler Masonry, Inc. v. City of Mabel, Exact Construction Company, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
Fieseler Masonry, Inc. v. City of Mabel, Exact Construction Company, LLC
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“[T]o state a claim for breach of contract, the plaintiff must show (1) formation of a contract, (2) performance by plaintiff of any conditions precedent to his right to demand performance by the defendant, and (3) breach of the contract by defendant.”
- Laura L. Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A. 851 N.W.2d 598 Minn. 2014
- Laura L. Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A. 851 N.W.2d 598 Minn. 2014
- Lyon Financial Services, Incorporated, d/b/a U.S. Bancorp Business Equipment Finance Group v. Illinois Paper and Copier Company 848 N.W.2d 539 Minn. 2014
-
Lyon Financial Services, Incorporated, d/b/a U.S. Bancorp Business Equipment Finance Group v. Illinois Paper and Copier Company
848 N.W.2d 539
Minn. 2014
The elements of a breach of contract claim are “(1) formation of a contract, (2) performance by plaintiff of any conditions precedent to his right to demand performance by the defendant, and (3) breach of the contract by defendant.” (citing Briggs Transp.
- Gretsch v. Vantium Capital, Inc. 846 N.W.2d 424 Minn. 2014
-
Gretsch v. Vantium Capital, Inc.
846 N.W.2d 424
Minn. 2014
Finally, in reviewing the district court’s dismissal of the complaint, we consider “only the facts alleged in the complaint, accepting those facts as true and must construe all reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmoving party.” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).
- Finn v. Alliance Bank 838 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
-
Finn v. Alliance Bank
838 N.W.2d 585
Minn. Ct. App. 2013
An appellate court reviews the “construction and application of a statute of limitations, including the law governing the accrual of a cause of action, de novo.” (quotation omitted).
- Sipe v. STS Manufacturing, Inc. 834 N.W.2d 683 Minn. 2013
-
Sipe v. STS Manufacturing, Inc.
834 N.W.2d 683
Minn. 2013
We review de novo the “construction and application of a statute of limitations, including the law governing the accrual of a cause of action.” (internal quotation marks omitted).
- Weavewood, Inc. v. S & P Home Investments, LLC 821 N.W.2d 576 Minn. 2012
-
Weavewood, Inc. v. S & P Home Investments, LLC
821 N.W.2d 576
Minn. 2012
We review de novo the district court’s grant of summary judgment to S & (explaining that the application of statutes of limitations is reviewed de novo).
- Sipe v. STS Manufacturing, Inc. 822 N.W.2d 2 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
-
Sipe v. STS Manufacturing, Inc.
822 N.W.2d 2
Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Appellate courts review de novo “the construction and application of a statute of limitations, including the law governing the accrual of a cause of action,” and “the grant of a motion to dismiss.” ' (quotation omitted).