Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Davis, 820 N.W.2d 525.

190 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Charles Kihanya Minn. Ct. App. 2015
d 525, 537 (Minn. 2012).
State of Minnesota v. Kunta Kinta Viverette Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Kunta Kinta Viverette Minn. Ct. App. 2015
An error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt if the jury’s verdict was surely unattributable to the error.” (citation and quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Brian Kenneth Moore 863 N.W.2d 111 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Brian Kenneth Moore 863 N.W.2d 111 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Amir Abd El Malak Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Amir Abd El Malak Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See, n.10 (Minn. 2012) (stating that “decisions about which witnesses to interview are typically matters of trial strategy that we will not review”); d 224, 236 (Minn. 1986) (stating that decisions about “[w]hich witnesses to call at trial and what information to present to the jury are qu
State of Minnesota v. David Muniz Bustos 861 N.W.2d 655 Minn. 2015
State v. Campbell 861 N.W.2d 95 Minn. 2015
State v. Campbell 861 N.W.2d 95 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Vida Kay Bjorklund Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Vida Kay Bjorklund Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Justin Christopher Mitchell Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Justin Christopher Mitchell Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Travis Clay Andersen Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Travis Clay Andersen Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(“When an error implicates a constitutional right, we will award a new trial unless the error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.”) “An error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt if the jury’s verdict was ‘surely unattributable’ to the error.” Id.
State of Minnesota v. Dylan Micheal Kelley 855 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Dylan Micheal Kelley 855 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 2014
(concluding that the defendant’s trial strategy impacted whether trial error was prejudicial).
State of Minnesota v. Dean James Roehler Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Dean James Roehler Minn. Ct. App. 2014
An error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt if the jury’s verdict was surely unattributable to the error.” (citation and quotations omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Antoine Rumel Little 851 N.W.2d 878 Minn. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Michael Arthur Boelz Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Eric Jerome Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Eric Jerome Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Michael Arthur Boelz Minn. Ct. App. 2014
See, (declining to grant a new trial based on the cumulative impact of 13 various errors, stating that “this case does not resemble the close factual cases in which we have ordered new trials for cumulative errors” and that the errors, taken together, wer
State of Minnesota v. Enamidem Celestine Okon Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Enamidem Celestine Okon Minn. Ct. App. 2014
An error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt if the jury’s verdict was surely unattributable to the error.” (citation and quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Steven Anthony Ehlen Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Steven Anthony Ehlen Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Moore 846 N.W.2d 83 Minn. 2014
State v. Moore 846 N.W.2d 83 Minn. 2014
State v. Morrow 834 N.W.2d 715 Minn. 2013
State v. Morrow 834 N.W.2d 715 Minn. 2013
"We have held, in rare cases, that the cumulative effect of trial errors can deprive a defendant of his constitutional right to a fair trial when the 'errors and indiscretions, none of which alone might have been enough to tip the scales, operate to the defendant's prejudice by producing a biased jury.’ " ().
State v. Griffin 834 N.W.2d 688 Minn. 2013
State v. Griffin 834 N.W.2d 688 Minn. 2013
When determining whether the statement has “ ‘equivalent circumstantial guarantees of trustworthiness,’ ” a district court uses a “totality of the circumstances test.” (quoting Minn. R. Evid.
State v. Sterling 834 N.W.2d 162 Minn. 2013
State v. Sterling 834 N.W.2d 162 Minn. 2013
“When an error implicates a constitutional right, we will award a new trial unless the error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.”
State v. Nicks 831 N.W.2d 493 Minn. 2013
Andersen v. State 830 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2013
Andersen v. State 830 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2013
539 n. 10 (Minn.2012) (noting that decisions about which witnesses to interview are typically matters of trial strategy that we will not review); (noting that whether to cross-examine the State’s expert witness constitutes trial strategy); Bobo, d at 138-39