Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Dourney v. CMAK Corp., 796 N.W.2d 537.

57 citing documents.

Pamela Beidel v. Corporate Commission of Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe Indians - Grand Casino Hinckley, Department of … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“Whether the employee committed a particular act is a fact question, which we review in the light most favorable to the decision and will affirm if supported by substantial evidence.”
Cathy Justice v. Glacial Ridge Hospital, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Cathy Justice v. Glacial Ridge Hospital, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“Whether the employee committed a particular act is a fact question, which we review in the light most favorable to the decision and will affirm if supported by substantial evidence.”
Michael Robin v. BHSI LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Michael Robin v. BHSI LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“Substantial evidence” is evidence that “a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.”
Andrew R. Patson v. Skaff Apartments, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Andrew R. Patson v. Skaff Apartments, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“Inadvertent conduct, even if negligent, is not employment misconduct.” 540 (Minn. App. 2011) (“A person is negligent when she fails to do something that a reasonable person would do.