Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Zais, 805 N.W.2d 32.

57 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Cree Rae Larson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
To satisfy the critical-impact test, the state must show “clearly and unequivocally (1) that the district court’s ruling was erroneous and (2) that the ruling will have a ‘critical impact’ on the State’s ability to prosecute the case.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Bruce Martin 849 N.W.2d 99 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Bruce Martin 849 N.W.2d 99 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
lt in the dismissal of the prostitution charge one year after Martin’s probationary period expires, is the functional equivalent of a stay of adjudication because it results in dismissal.” To obtain review of an adverse pretrial ruling, the state must “clearly and unequivocally” show that the “ruling will have a critical impact on the State’s ability to prosecute the case.” (quotation omitted).
State v. Rohan 834 N.W.2d 223 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Rohan 834 N.W.2d 223 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
(instructing that critical impact exists when district court’s order “significantly reduces the likelihood of a successful prosecution”) (quotations omitted).
Johnson v. State 820 N.W.2d 24 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Johnson v. State 820 N.W.2d 24 Minn. Ct. App. 2012