Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Givens v. Darst, 800 N.W.2d 652.

23 citing documents.

Flaigan v. Kittelson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Douros v. Morse 560 P.3d 372 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
In re the Custody of KAG: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
31, 2024); In re the 5 In its conclusions of law, the district court also expressly determined that Gerding had “presented clear and convincing evidence that granting visitation rights in the amount of week-on/week-off parenting time would not interfere with J.H.’s relationship with [mother].” 12 Minor Child of C.D.G.D., rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
In the Matter of: Ellen Sue Laas Ewald v. Nina Laas Ewald Nedrebo, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In the Matter of: Ellen Sue Laas Ewald v. Nina Laas Ewald Nedrebo, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In the Matter of: Ronald Jeffrey Smith v. Brian Robert Kessen Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In the Matter of: Ronald Jeffrey Smith v. Brian Robert Kessen Minn. Ct. App. 2023
1; rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Custody of: J. A. J., Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Thomas Anthony Greshowak, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
4 (2006)); -56 (Minn. App. 2011) (applying the standard set forth in SooHoo to grandparent visitation), rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
Ronald Jeffrey Smith, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
4 (2006)); -56 (Minn. App. 2011) (applying the standard set forth in SooHoo to grandparent visitation), rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
In Re the Custody of: KCDC DOB 1-9-2018, Kristin Annette Vanderheyden, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
This right includes “deciding who spends time with the child.” rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
James Michael Eidson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Id.; review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Greta Mae Markuson, n/k/a Greta Mae Garcia, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57, 69–70 , 120 S. Ct. 2054, 2062 (2000) (discussing a parent’s fundamental right to parent one’s children); –63 (Minn. App. 2011), review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Matter of: William Gussert, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
d 652, 659 (Minn. App. 2011), review denied (Minn. Aug.
Amarreh v. Amarreh 918 N.W.2d 228 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Amarreh v. Amarreh 918 N.W.2d 228 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
656 (Minn. App. 2011) (stating that grandparent seeking visitation rights "must prove by clear and convincing evidence that visitation would not interfere with the parent-child relationship"), review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Thor Richard Asfeld, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Renee Wiskow, et al., petitioners, Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Kelly Elizabeth Bennett, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Under the common law and the Constitution, “[a] parent has the fundamental right to make parenting decisions, including deciding who spends time with the child.” –56 (Minn. App. 2011), review denied (Minn. Aug.
Joyce Elaine Hansen v. Jeffrey Ray Hanson, Joni Michelle Herdrich Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Joyce Elaine Hansen v. Jeffrey Ray Hanson, Joni Michelle Herdrich Minn. Ct. App. 2015
We also remind the parties that “specific terms of judicially ordered visitation are no substitute for flexibility and cooperative arrangements in the child’s best interests.” review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Matter of: A. B. Wayne Belisle v. Yana Verzhbitskaya Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Matter of: A. B. Wayne Belisle v. Yana Verzhbitskaya Minn. Ct. App. 2015
tected fundamental right “to make decisions concerning the care, custody, and control of his or her children,” SooHoo, d at 820 (citing Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57, 65, 120 S. Ct. 2054, 2060 (2000)), grandparents “must prove by clear and convincing evidence that visitation would not interfere with the parent-child relationship” in order to be awarded visitation, review denied (Minn. Aug.