Cited by

at 205; -12 2 (Minn. 2012) (declining to extend the doctrine to recreational snowmobiling).

The association argues that Neegard failed to offer evidence that the association “did something that a reasonable golf course operator would not do.” First, as to breach of duty, primary assumption of the risk “completely bars a plaintiff’s claim because it negates the defendant’s duty of care to the plaintiff.”

“JMOL is inappropriate if jurors could differ on the conclusions to be drawn from the record.” (quotation omitted).

“A party is entitled to a specific jury instruction if evidence exists at trial to support the instruction.” (quotation omitted).

d 113, 119 (Minn. 2012).

A district court has broad discretion to determine jury instructions, and this court “will not reverse where jury instructions overall fairly and correctly state the applicable law.” Daly v. McFarland, 6 (quotations omitted).

(“A special verdict form is to be liberally construed to give effect to the intention of the jury and on appellate review it is the court’s responsibility to harmonize all findings if at all possible.” (quotation omitted)).

Daly v. McFarland , , 120-21 (Minn. 2012) ; Springrose , d at 827 (explaining that primary assumption of risk "is not ...

Daly v. McFarland , , 119 (Minn. 2012).

Daly v. McFarland , , 119 (Minn. 2012).

Daly v. McFarland , , 122 (Minn. 2012) (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).

“Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the nonmoving party, this court makes an independent determination of whether there is sufficient evidence to present an issue of fact for the jury.” Jerry’s Enters., Inc., d at 816; d 113, 119 (Minn. 2012) (“A motion for judgment as a matter of law is reviewed de novo.”).

On appeal, we review a district court’s jury instructions for abuse of discreti on, and will afford relief on appeal “if the jury instruction was erroneous and such error was prejudicial to respondent, or if the instruction was erroneous and its effect cannot be determined.” (quotations omitted).

A district court presented with inconsistent special verdict form answers may change the answers, “in effect partially directing a verdict, where it is deemed that a jury’s response must be changed as a matter of law.” (quotation omitted).

We "typically do not review issues not raised in the petition.” , 126 n. 6 (Minn.2012).

“Primary assumption of the risk completely negates a defendant’s negligence” by “negating] the defendant’s duty of care to the plaintiff.” Daly v. McFar *633 land, (quotation omitted).

(holding that collision between participants is not an inherent risk of snowmobiling because a snowmobile, "carefully operated, is no more hazardous than an automobile, train, or taxi”).

JMOL is “inappropriate if jurors could differ on the conclusions to be drawn from the record.” (quotation omitted).

And we are “ ‘extremely reluctant to overrule our precedent under principles of stare decisis’ [and] require a ‘compelling reason’ before a prior decision will be overruled.” ().