DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Braylock v. Jesson, 819 N.W.2d 585.

76 citing documents.

Deborah Brakefield, Relator v. IND. School District 2889, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Because the amendment “merely clarifies preexisting law, the amended statute applies to all future or pending litigation.”
Diane Quick, Relator v. Polar Semiconductor, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Lennis Bentrud, Relator v. Robin Drug Corp., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Lennis Bentrud, Relator v. Robin Drug Corp., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(providing that when an amendment clarifies 7 presented establishes that she had a tense relationship with Joy, which could have led to oversensitivity as to their interactions.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Matthew Alan Radke. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Matthew Alan Radke. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Donald Bergs, Relator v. Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Donald Bergs, Relator v. Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Nimco Osman, Relator v. Supershuttle International, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Nimco Osman, Relator v. Supershuttle International, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
James Richardson Jr., Relator v. Alamco Wood Products LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
James Richardson Jr., Relator v. Alamco Wood Products LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Because the amendment “merely clarifies preexisting law, the amended statute applies to all future or pending litigation.”
Pamela Jeanne Googe, Relator v. Capstone Services, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Pamela Jeanne Googe, Relator v. Capstone Services, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Because the amendment “merely clarifies preexisting law, the amended statute applies to all future or pending litigation.”
Dezeray Marie Roblero-Barrios v. Lucinda Jesson, Commissioner of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Dezeray Marie Roblero-Barrios v. Lucinda Jesson, Commissioner of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Larson v. Jesson 847 N.W.2d 531 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Larson v. Jesson 847 N.W.2d 531 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Wilson 830 N.W.2d 849 Minn. 2013
State v. Wilson 830 N.W.2d 849 Minn. 2013
Black’s Law Dictionary 209 (8th ed.2004); (describing a burden of production).
Coker v. Jesson 831 N.W.2d 483 Minn. 2013
Coker v. Jesson 831 N.W.2d 483 Minn. 2013
2 We have recently described that burden as a “burden of production,” which requires the committed person “to come forward with sufficient, competent evidence that, if proven, would entitle the petitioner to relief.”
Ramsey County v. Guardian D.F. ex rel. of K.D.F. 828 N.W.2d 138 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Ramsey County v. Guardian D.F. ex rel. of K.D.F. 828 N.W.2d 138 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
§ 645.02 (2012); (applying section 645.02 in different context).
State v. R.H.B. 821 N.W.2d 817 Minn. 2012
State v. R.H.B. 821 N.W.2d 817 Minn. 2012
See supra Part I; -90 (Minn.2012) (defining the burden of production).