Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Boland v. Murtha, 800 N.W.2d 179.

74 citing documents.

Serena Rae Sullivan v. Robert John Sladek Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Serena Rae Sullivan v. Robert John Sladek Minn. Ct. App. 2016
to restrict parenting time, this court first “review[s] de novo whether the district court properly treated the allegations in the moving party’s affidavit as true, disregarded the contrary allegations in the nonmoving party’s affidavits, and 3 considered only the explanatory allegations in the nonmoving party’s affidavits.”
Kathryn Suzanne Neufeld, f/k/a Kathryn Suzanne Hare v. Robert Russell Hare Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Kathryn Suzanne Neufeld, f/k/a Kathryn Suzanne Hare v. Robert Russell Hare Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: David Allen Anderson v. Lisa Marie Anderson n/k/a Lisa Marie Syverson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Darick Joseph Waguespack v. Jocelyn Alicia Merz Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Darick Joseph Waguespack v. Jocelyn Alicia Merz Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: David Allen Anderson v. Lisa Marie Anderson n/k/a Lisa Marie Syverson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
n evidentiary hearing, this court: (1) reviews de novo whether the district court accepted the moving party’s allegations as true; (2) reviews for an abuse of discretion the district court’s determination as to whether a prima facie case exists for the modification; and (3) reviews de novo “whether the district court properly determined the need for an evidentiary hearing.”
In re the Marriage of: Jaime Dawn Starren v. Jason Charles Starren Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Jaime Dawn Starren v. Jason Charles Starren Minn. Ct. App. 2015
As described above, a motion to modify custody or to 10 impose a locale restriction would be analyzed under section 518.18(d).4 When faced with such a motion, a
In re the Marriage of: Tamara Eileen Goemaat v. Andrew Joel Goemaat Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Tamara Eileen Goemaat v. Andrew Joel Goemaat Minn. Ct. App. 2015
d 179, 185 (Minn. App. 2011).
Sheikh Bilaal Muhammad Arafat f/k/a Mark Edward Wetsch v. Barlin Mohamed Ahmed Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Sheikh Bilaal Muhammad Arafat f/k/a Mark Edward Wetsch v. Barlin Mohamed Ahmed Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Melissa Jo Butler v. Vance Aaron Butler Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Melissa Jo Butler v. Vance Aaron Butler Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“First, we review de novo whether the district court properly treated the allegations in the moving party’s affidavits as true, disregarded the contrary allegations in the nonmoving party’s affidavits, and considered only the explanatory allegations in the 5 nonmoving party’s affidavits.”
In re the Marriage of: Denise Louise Spanier v. Terence Urban Spanier 852 N.W.2d 284 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Denise Louise Spanier v. Terence Urban Spanier 852 N.W.2d 284 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Thomas M. Dillahunt v. Tami L. Dillahunt, n/k/a Tami L. Mitchell Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Thomas M. Dillahunt v. Tami L. Dillahunt, n/k/a Tami L. Mitchell Minn. Ct. App. 2014
We first review de novo “whether the district court properly treated the allegations in the moving party’s affidavits as true.”
In re the Marriage of: Jan H. Kehlenbeck v. Kurt H. Kehlenbeck Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Jan H. Kehlenbeck v. Kurt H. Kehlenbeck Minn. Ct. App. 2014
d 179, 185 (Minn. App. 2011).
In re the Welfare of the Children of L.L.P. 836 N.W.2d 563 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
In re the Welfare of the Children of L.L.P. 836 N.W.2d 563 Minn. Ct. App. 2013