Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Nelson v. Nelson, 806 N.W.2d 870.

58 citing documents.

Carleen Kaye Theno, n/k/a Carleen Kaye Starkovich v. John Marvin Theno Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Carleen Kaye Theno, n/k/a Carleen Kaye Starkovich v. John Marvin Theno Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“While a district court may not modify a final property division,” such as the division of pension benefits in a judgment and decree, “it may issue orders to implement, enforce, or clarify the provisions of a decree, so long as it does not change the parties’ substantive rights.” (quotation omitted).
In re the Marriage of: James Allen Ertl v. Diane Martha Ertl 871 N.W.2d 410 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: James Allen Ertl v. Diane Martha Ertl 871 N.W.2d 410 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(“In interpreting a contract, the language is to be given its plain and ordinary meaning.”); see also Chergosky v. Crosstown Bell, Inc., -26 (Minn. 1990) (presuming that parties intended the language used to have effect and cautioning courts against interpreting contracts
In re the Marriage of: Jo Ellen M. Healy v. John Henry Healy, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Jo Ellen M. Healy v. John Henry Healy, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(stating this principle with respect to stipulated dissolution judgments).
In re the Marriage of: Charles A. T. Gill v. Kathryn E. K. Gill Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Charles A. T. Gill v. Kathryn E. K. Gill Minn. Ct. App. 2014