Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Buckingham v. State, 799 N.W.2d 229.
-
Erickson v. State
842 N.W.2d 314
Minn. 2014
8 (2012); , 232 n. 1 (Minn.2011); , 44 (Minn.2010).
- Hooper v. State 838 N.W.2d 775 Minn. 2013
- Hooper v. State 838 N.W.2d 775 Minn. 2013
- State v. Nicks 831 N.W.2d 493 Minn. 2013
- Sontoya v. State 829 N.W.2d 602 Minn. 2013
- Andersen v. State 830 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2013
- Andersen v. State 830 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2013
- McDonough v. State 827 N.W.2d 423 Minn. 2013
- McDonough v. State 827 N.W.2d 423 Minn. 2013
- Berkovitz v. State 826 N.W.2d 203 Minn. 2013
-
Berkovitz v. State
826 N.W.2d 203
Minn. 2013
(concluding that two claims raised in a postconviction petition were procedurally barred because they were, closely related to claims *210 the petitioner had raised on direct appeal).
- Bobo v. State 820 N.W.2d 511 Minn. 2012