Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In re the Civil Commitment of Navratil, 799 N.W.2d 643.

59 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Matthew Alan Radke Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. Aug.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Gary George Spicer 853 N.W.2d 803 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Gary George Spicer 853 N.W.2d 803 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
P. 52.01; review denied (Minn. Aug.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Andrew Nordstrom Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Andrew Nordstrom Minn. Ct. App. 2014
See In re Civil 5 Commitment of Navratil, (rejecting argument that “not otherwise specified” designation in diagnosis in that case did not mean that it was “less of a disorder”), review denied (Minn. Aug.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: John Howard Thuringer Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: John Howard Thuringer Minn. Ct. App. 2014
P. 52.01; review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Civil Commitment of Moen 837 N.W.2d 40 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
In re the Civil Commitment of Moen 837 N.W.2d 40 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Indeed, this court has stated that “the availability or adequacy of treatment afforded to committed individuals is outside the scope of the commitment process.” review denied (Minn. Aug.