Cited by

d 340, 353 n.1 (Minn. 2012).

Counsel provides objectively reasonable representation by “exercising the customary skills and diligence that a reasonably competent attorney would perform under similar circumstances.” (quotation omitted).

“An error is plain if it contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotation omitted).

An attorney meets the objective standard of reasonableness by “exercising the customary skills and diligence that a reasonable competent attorney would perform under 7 similar circumstances.” (quotation omitted).

An error is “harmless beyond a reasonable doubt” when, assuming the potential damage of the excluded evidence were fully realized, a reasonable jury “would have reached the same verdict.” Post , 512.

(stating that appellate court need not address both parts of Strickland test if one is determinative).

There is no right to in-camera review of private data; “the defendant must first establish a plausible showing that the information sought would be both material and favorable to his defense.” (quotation omitted).

Cf. Sanchez, d at 558-60 6 (concluding that objective standard applies to determination when claim arose for purposes of section 590.01, subdivision 4(c)); (concluding that objective standard applies to determination whether attorney provided effective assistance).

“On appeal, we review the limits placed by the 5 district court on the release and use of protected records for an abuse of discretion.”

“Other facts beyond the material elements of the offense [a]re available through discovery procedures.” -87 (Minn. 1988); see also State v. 6 Hokanson, (“Criminal defendants have a broad right to discovery in order to prepare and present a defense.”).

“Criminal defendants have a right to prepare and present a complete defense.”

The petitioner “has the burden of alleging facts that, if proven, entitle him to relief.”

“Criminal defendants have a broad right to discovery in order to prepare and present a defense.” (citing Paradee, d at 642).

n.1 (Minn. 2012) (“Direct evidence is that which proves a fact without an inference or presumption and which in itself, if true, establishes that fact.” (Quotation omitted)); (Stras, J., concurring in part) (defining circumstantial evidence as “evidence based

“Claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are reviewed de novo because they involve mixed questions of fact and law.”

(stating that “[appellate] courts do[] not review matters of trial strategy or the particular tactics used by counsel”); (stating that “the depth of .

“Criminal defendants have a broad right to discovery in order to prepare and present a defense.” (citing Paradee, d at 642).

An attorney meets the objective standard of reasonableness by “exercising the customary skills and diligence that a reasonably competent attorney would perform under similar circumstances.” (quotation omitted), cert.