Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Hokanson, 821 N.W.2d 340.

182 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Jason Lonny Spillum Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Gassoway Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Gassoway Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Dayna Kristine Bell Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Dayna Kristine Bell Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(quotation omitted), cert.
Matthew Thomas Fahey v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. John Onokwuozo Onyemekeihia Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. John Onokwuozo Onyemekeihia Minn. Ct. App. 2014
n.1 (Minn. 2012) (concluding that witness testimony based on the witness’s personal knowledge or observations is direct evidence).
Matthew Thomas Fahey v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Counsel is held to an objective standard of reasonableness of “the customary skills and diligence that a reasonably competent attorney would perform under similar circumstances.” (quotation omitted), cert.
State of Minnesota v. Ahavel Abimbola Scherz Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Ahavel Abimbola Scherz Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“We review a postconviction court’s legal conclusions de novo, and its factual findings for clear error.”
State of Minnesota v. Donald William Carlson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Roosevelt Hunter Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Roosevelt Hunter Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Donald William Carlson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
The district court must not admit alternative-perpetrator evidence when the defendant does not first “lay a proper foundation for admission of such evidence by offering evidence that has an inherent tendency to connect the alternative perpetrator to the commission of the charged crime.” (quotation omitted), cert.
Michael Frederick Schmidt v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Michael Frederick Schmidt v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“The objective standard of reasonableness is defined as representation by an attorney exercising the customary skills and diligence that a reasonably competent attorney would perform under similar circumstances.” d 340, 358 (Minn. 2012) (quotation omitted), cert.
Erickson v. State 842 N.W.2d 314 Minn. 2014
Erickson v. State 842 N.W.2d 314 Minn. 2014
State v. Bahtuoh 840 N.W.2d 804 Minn. 2013
State v. Bahtuoh 840 N.W.2d 804 Minn. 2013
(“We review a postconviction court’s ...
State v. Hayes 831 N.W.2d 546 Minn. 2013
State v. Nicks 831 N.W.2d 493 Minn. 2013
State v. Silvernail 831 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 2013
State v. Hayes 831 N.W.2d 546 Minn. 2013
We recently addressed Hayes’s
State v. Silvernail 831 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 2013
(citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).
Francis v. State 829 N.W.2d 415 Minn. 2013
Francis v. State 829 N.W.2d 415 Minn. 2013
State v. McElroy 828 N.W.2d 741 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. McElroy 828 N.W.2d 741 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Appellant bears the burden to prove the error affected his substantial rights, which is considered a “heavy burden.” (quotations omitted).
McDonough v. State 827 N.W.2d 423 Minn. 2013
McDonough v. State 827 N.W.2d 423 Minn. 2013

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by