Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Baker v. Best Buy Stores, LP, 812 N.W.2d 177.

25 citing documents.

Leo Gadbois, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Baker v. Best Buy Stores, LP, rev. denied (Minn. Apr.
SECURA Insurance Company, as subrogee of Lance Goettl d/b/a TLG Farm Partnership v. Deere & Company, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
SECURA Insurance Company, as subrogee of Lance Goettl d/b/a TLG Farm Partnership v. Deere & Company, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Baker v. Best Buy Stores, LP, rev. denied (Minn. Apr.
Edgard Mariano, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
However, if a complaint contains a contract- based claim, “the court may consider the entire written contract when the complaint refers to the contract and the contract is central to the claims alleged.” Baker v. Best Buy Stores, LP, (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Apr.
Deborah Jane Clapp v. Rochelle Cox, in her official capacity as Interim Superintendent of Minneapolis ... Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Deborah Jane Clapp v. Rochelle Cox, in her official capacity as Interim Superintendent of Minneapolis ... Minn. Ct. App. 2023
And if a complaint contains a contract- based claim, “the court may consider the entire written contract when the complaint refers to the contract and the contract is central to the claims alleged.” Baker v. Best Buy Stores, LP, (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Apr.
Lynn Peterson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
P. 9.02; see, e.g., Baker v. Best Buy Stores, LP, -84 (Minn. App. 2012) (reasoning that, like Fed.
BDS Laundry Management Company, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Additionally, if the complaint contains a contract-based claim, “the court ‘may consider the entire written contract when the complaint refers to the contract and the 6 contract is central to the claims alleged.’” Baker v. Best Buy Stores, LP, (quoting In re Hennepin Cty.
Jeremy J. Cobb, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See Baker v. Best Buy Stores, LP, (upholding unfavorable retail service contract provision that terminated the contract upon replacement of a purchased good, because the purchasers agreed to the contract term and “received the benefit of the bargain” with the retailer), review denied (Minn. Apr.
Amanda M. Doub, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“In deciding a motion to dismiss, the court may consider the entire written contract when the complaint refers to the contract and the contract is central to the claims alleged.” Baker v. Best Buy Stores, LP, d 177, 180 (Minn. App. 2012) (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Apr.
Town Center Office Plaza Association, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Particularity requires that the association allege “ultimate facts.” Baker v. Best Buy Stores, LP, d 177, 182 (Minn. App. 2012).
First Class Valet Services, LLC v. Gleason 892 N.W.2d 848 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
First Class Valet Services, LLC v. Gleason 892 N.W.2d 848 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Baker v. Best Buy Stores, LP, review denied (Minn. Apr.
Waseca County v. Minnesota Department of Transportation Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Waseca County v. Minnesota Department of Transportation Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“In deciding a motion to dismiss, [a] court ‘may consider the entire written contract when the complaint refers to the contract and the contract is central to the claims alleged.’” Baker v. Best Buy Stores, LP, (quoting In re Hennepin Cty.
Angeles v. Medtronic, Inc. 863 N.W.2d 404 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Paul v. Angeles, (A14-1149), Charlene Mead, (A14-1150), Charles Starovasnik, Jr., (A14-1151), Trudy Marse, (A14-1152), Rebecca Manuel, (A14-1153), Claude … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Angeles v. Medtronic, Inc. 863 N.W.2d 404 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“[T]he circumstances required to be pled with particularity under Rule [9.02] are the time, place, and contents of the false representations, as well as the identity of the person making the misrepresentation and what he obtained thereby.” Baker v. Best Buy Stores, LP, (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Apr.
Paul v. Angeles, (A14-1149), Charlene Mead, (A14-1150), Charles Starovasnik, Jr., (A14-1151), Trudy Marse, (A14-1152), Rebecca Manuel, (A14-1153), Claude … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“[T]he circumstances required to be pled with particularity under Rule [9.02] are the time, place, and contents 31 of the false representations, as well as the identity of the person making the misrepresentation and what he obtained thereby.” Baker v. Best Buy Stores, LP, (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Apr.
Elfi E. Janssen v. Lommen, Abdo, Cole, King & Stageberg, P. A., Sibley Holdings, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Elfi E. Janssen v. Lommen, Abdo, Cole, King & Stageberg, P. A., Sibley Holdings, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Baker v. Best Buy Stores, LP, -84 (Minn. App. 2012), review denied (Minn. Apr.
Capital Midwest Fund, LP v. Douglas E. Johnson, Steven Quay Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Capital Midwest Fund, LP v. Douglas E. Johnson, Steven Quay Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“[T]he circumstances required to be pled with particularity under Rule [9.02] are the time, place, and contents of the false representations, as well as the identity of the person making the misrepresentation and what he obtained thereby.” Baker v. Best 12 Buy Stores, LP, (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Apr.
Graphic Communications Local 1B Health & Welfare Fund "A" v. CVS Caremark Corp. 833 N.W.2d 403 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Graphic Communications Local 1B Health & Welfare Fund "A" v. CVS Caremark Corp. 833 N.W.2d 403 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
P. 9.02; Baker v. Best Buy Stores, LP, review denied (Minn. Apr.