DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In re the Welfare of J.J.P., 831 N.W.2d 260.

76 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Kristyn Nicole Schouweiler Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Minn. Stat. § 645.16 (2014)
In the Matter of the WELFARE OF: J.T.L., Child 875 N.W.2d 334 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the WELFARE OF: J.T.L., Child 875 N.W.2d 334 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Welfare of J.J.P.
Thomas v. Engfer v. General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development 869 N.W.2d 295 Minn. 2015
Thomas v. Engfer v. General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development 869 N.W.2d 295 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Bradley Scott Junker Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Bradley Scott Junker Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Conga Corporation, d/b/a Conga Latin Bistro v. Commissioner of Revenue, Relator. 868 N.W.2d 41 Minn. 2015
Harvey Ray Dupey v. State of Minnesota 868 N.W.2d 36 Minn. 2015
Harvey Ray Dupey v. State of Minnesota 868 N.W.2d 36 Minn. 2015
Conga Corporation, d/b/a Conga Latin Bistro v. Commissioner of Revenue, Relator. 868 N.W.2d 41 Minn. 2015
Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Duluth v. Brian Lee 852 N.W.2d 683 Minn. 2014
Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Duluth v. Brian Lee 852 N.W.2d 683 Minn. 2014
see Minn. Stat. § 645.08(1) (stating that “technical words and phrases” that have acquired a special meaning are construed in accordance with that special meaning).
Graphic Communications Local 1B Health & Welfare Fund "A", Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. CVS Caremark Corporation, Appellants/Cross-Respondents, Coborn's Incorporated, Appellant/Cross-Respondent, … 850 N.W.2d 682 Minn. 2014
Graphic Communications Local 1B Health & Welfare Fund "A", Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. CVS Caremark Corporation, Appellants/Cross-Respondents, Coborn's Incorporated, Appellant/Cross-Respondent, … 850 N.W.2d 682 Minn. 2014
JME of Monticello, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue 848 N.W.2d 505 Minn. 2014
JME of Monticello, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue 848 N.W.2d 505 Minn. 2014
In re the Welfare of J.H. 844 N.W.2d 28 Minn. 2014
In re the Welfare of J.H. 844 N.W.2d 28 Minn. 2014
State v. Watkins 840 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 2013
State v. Watkins 840 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 2013
Fiduciary Foundation, LLC v. Brown 834 N.W.2d 756 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Duluth v. Lee 832 N.W.2d 868 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Fiduciary Foundation, LLC v. Brown 834 N.W.2d 756 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
“Statutory interpretation is a question of law [that an appellate court] review[s] de novo,” and it “read[s] a statute as a whole” “to ascertain and effectuate the intent of the Legislature.”
Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Duluth v. Lee 832 N.W.2d 868 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
-67 (Minn.2013) (citing Minn.Stat.
State v. M.D.T. 831 N.W.2d 276 Minn. 2013