Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite McKee v. Laurion, 825 N.W.2d 725.

62 citing documents.

Kaytee Hooser v. Keith Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Kaytee Hooser v. Keith Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Fieseler Masonry, Inc. v. City of Mabel, Exact Construction Company, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Fieseler Masonry, Inc. v. City of Mabel, Exact Construction Company, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“No genuine issue for trial exists when the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the nonmoving party.” (quotations omitted).
Sterling State Bank v. Maas Commercial Properties, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Sterling State Bank v. Maas Commercial Properties, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“No genuine issue for trial exists when the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the nonmoving party.”
State ex rel. Swanson v. Integrity Advance, LLC 846 N.W.2d 435 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State ex rel. Swanson v. Integrity Advance, LLC 846 N.W.2d 435 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
While we conduct a de novo review of the district court’s summary judgment decision, “[w]e review a district court’s evidentiary rulings, including rulings on foundational reliability, for an abuse of discretion,” Doe 76C v. Archdiocese of St.
Finn v. Alliance Bank 838 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Finn v. Alliance Bank 838 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
(summary judgment); (rule 12.02(e) dismissal).
Eischen v. Crystal Valley Cooperative 835 N.W.2d 629 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Eischen v. Crystal Valley Cooperative 835 N.W.2d 629 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
An appellate court “view[s] the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.”