Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Montermini, 819 N.W.2d 447.
- Orozco v. State 841 N.W.2d 632 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
Orozco v. State
841 N.W.2d 632
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
preme court reversed this court’s decision to limit the remand to the sentencing component of the plea agreement and held “that where the district court finds no compelling or substantial circumstances supporting an upward departure in the sentence that was agreed upon in a plea agreement, it may consider motions to vacate the conviction and the plea agreement.” Id.; -55 (Minn.App.2012) (applying Lewis and recognizing that the *636 district court, in considering a decision on remand, has “flexib