Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Watkins, 840 N.W.2d 21.

153 citing documents.

  • State v. Griffin 846 N.W.2d 93 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
    Under a plain-error analysis, appellant is required to establish “(1) an *106 error, (2) that is plain, and (8) that affects [appellant’s] substantial rights.” ( (other citation omitted)).
  • State v. Wenthe 845 N.W.2d 222 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
  • State v. Wenthe 845 N.W.2d 222 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
    “An error in instructing the jury is prejudicial if there is a reasonable likelihood that giving the instruction in question had a significant effect on the jury’s verdict.” (quotation omitted).