Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Watkins, 840 N.W.2d 21.
-
State v. Griffin
846 N.W.2d 93
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Under a plain-error analysis, appellant is required to establish “(1) an *106 error, (2) that is plain, and (8) that affects [appellant’s] substantial rights.” ( (other citation omitted)).
- State v. Wenthe 845 N.W.2d 222 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
State v. Wenthe
845 N.W.2d 222
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“An error in instructing the jury is prejudicial if there is a reasonable likelihood that giving the instruction in question had a significant effect on the jury’s verdict.” (quotation omitted).