Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Riley v. State, 819 N.W.2d 162.

475 citing documents.

Alina Marie Konczak v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
The postconviction court “abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous 4 view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” d 162, 167 (Minn. 2012) (quotation omitted).
Eugene Erick Fort v. State of Minnesota 861 N.W.2d 674 Minn. 2015
Eugene Erick Fort v. State of Minnesota 861 N.W.2d 674 Minn. 2015
Robyn Lynn Hager v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Frank Anthony Mendoza v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Robyn Lynn Hager v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
DECISION A denial of postconviction relief is reviewed to determine whether the district court abused its discretion by making a decision that “is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).
Frank Anthony Mendoza v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Danny Hamilton v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Danny Hamilton v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
A postconviction court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic 3 and the facts in the record.” (quotation and citations omitted).
John Stephen Woodward v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Sabranino Altranino Thompson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Sabranino Altranino Thompson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
A postconviction court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (citations and quotations omitted).
John Stephen Woodward v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“To prove a claim by clear and convincing evidence, a party’s evidence should be unequivocal, intrinsically probable and credible, and free from frailties.” (quotation omitted).
Michael Wayne v. State of Minnesota 860 N.W.2d 702 Minn. 2015
Michael Wayne v. State of Minnesota 860 N.W.2d 702 Minn. 2015
3 barred.” (-71 (Minn. 2012)).
Phillip Anthony Roberts v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Phillip Anthony Roberts v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
and that application of the exception is not time- barred.”
Morris Gaye Kayee v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Daniel Morris Johnson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Douglas Neil Raasch v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Morris Gaye Kayee v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Daniel Morris Johnson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Douglas Neil Raasch v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“Generally, a person convicted of a crime who claims the conviction violates his rights under the constitution or laws of the United States or Minnesota may file a petition for postconviction relief.” see also Minn. Stat. § 590.01, subd.
Lynell Richard Ellison v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Lynell Richard Ellison v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“A postconviction court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).
Benard Nyangate Mauti v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Benard Nyangate Mauti v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Phillip Anthony Roberts v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Phillip Anthony Roberts v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Danny Ortega, Jr. v. State of Minnesota 856 N.W.2d 98 Minn. 2014
Danny Ortega, Jr. v. State of Minnesota 856 N.W.2d 98 Minn. 2014
Phillip Anthony Roberts v. State of Minnesota 856 N.W.2d 287 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Raymond Darrel Pfarr v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Raymond Darrel Pfarr v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Phillip Anthony Roberts v. State of Minnesota 856 N.W.2d 287 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
and that application of the exception is not time-barred.”
Lincoln Lamar Caldwell v. State of Minnesota 853 N.W.2d 766 Minn. 2014
Lincoln Lamar Caldwell v. State of Minnesota 853 N.W.2d 766 Minn. 2014
Willie James Richardson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Willie James Patterson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Willie James Patterson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Willie James Richardson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Vang 847 N.W.2d 248 Minn. 2014
State v. Vang 847 N.W.2d 248 Minn. 2014
Roman Nose v. State 845 N.W.2d 193 Minn. 2014
Roman Nose v. State 845 N.W.2d 193 Minn. 2014
Gulbertson v. State 843 N.W.2d 240 Minn. 2014
Gulbertson v. State 843 N.W.2d 240 Minn. 2014
There is an abuse of discretion when the postconviction court’s “decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).
Erickson v. State 842 N.W.2d 314 Minn. 2014
Erickson v. State 842 N.W.2d 314 Minn. 2014
Staunton v. State 842 N.W.2d 3 Minn. 2014