A11-2288 Precedential Affirmed Processed

Bourgoin v. Gillette Co.

Minnesota Supreme Court · Filed June 7, 2012 · 814 N.W.2d 357

Authorities cited

Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.

Opinion text

ORDER Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed and served on November 23, 2011, be and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that “[sjummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case). BY THE COURT: M_ Christopher J. Dietzen Associate Justice