Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In re the Welfare of J.R.B., 805 N.W.2d 895.

432 citing documents.

A16-1270 In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: M. M. and L. S., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
facts for clear error, but we review its determination of whether a 4 particular statutory basis for involuntarily terminating parental rights is present for an abuse of discretion.” review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: L. M. P., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“We review a district court’s ultimate determination that termination is in a child’s best interest for an abuse of discretion.” d 895, 905 (Minn. App. 2011), review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. B. and R. D. S., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. B. and R. D. S., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“We review a district court’s ultimate determination that termination is in a child’s best interest for an abuse of discretion.” d 895, 905 (Minn. App. 2011), review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: L. L. E. and E. C. F., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: v. R. E., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: v. R. E., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: L. L. E. and E. C. F., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: M. L. M. and T. E. H., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: M. L. M. and T. E. H., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-900 (Minn. App. 2011), review denied (Minn. Oct.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: D. C., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: D. C., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. L. H. and A. T. S., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: K. M. C. and D. S. W., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: K. M. C. and D. S. W., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. L. H. and A. T. S., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: K. Y., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: K. L. and D. L., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: D. C. a/k/a Q. N. F. (W.), Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: D. C. a/k/a Q. N. F. (W.), Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: K. Y., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: K. L. and D. L., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J.M.B., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: C. K. W. and G. B. W., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: C. K. W. and G. B. W., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J.M.B., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
facts for clear error, but we review its determination of whether a particular statutory basis for involuntarily terminating parental rights is present for an abuse of discretion.” review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: P. L. G., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: N. U. M., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: P. L. G., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-902 (Minn. App. 2011), review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: N. U. M., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
d 895, 905 (Minn. App. 2011), review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S. S., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S. S., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
supported by clear-and-convincing evidence, a district court must first “find[] the underlying facts regarding the statutory criteria relevant to a particular basis for terminating parental rights” and then “in light of its findings of those underlying facts, exercise[] its judgment to address whether that basis for terminating parental rights is present.” -900 (Minn. App. 2011), review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. B. and S. N.-J., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. B. and S. N.-J., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Best interests of the child” means “all relevant factors to be considered and evaluated.” Minn. Stat. § 260C.511(a) (2014); (“In analyzing a child’s best interests, the court must balance three factors: (1) the child’s interest in preserving the parent-child relationship; (2) the parent’s interest in preserving the parent-child relationship; and (3) any competing interest of the child.”(quotations omitted)), revi
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: K. B., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: K. B., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Determining whether any particular statutory basis for involuntarily terminating parental rights is present requires the district court to make findings on multiple statutory 6 factors, and to decide whether its findings on those factors show the statutory basis for termination to be present.” review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: W. J. C., III, and G. A. C., … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: W. J. C., III, and G. A. C., … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-02 (Minn. App. 2011), review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: M. A. K. and A. L. P., Sr., … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: M. A. K. and A. L. P., Sr., … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-900, 899 n.2 (Minn. App. 2011), review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: D. S., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: D. S., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: D. O., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S. E. N. and R. D. J., Jr., … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: P. A. S. and D. J. P., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S. E. N. and R. D. J., Jr., … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: D. O., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
On appeal, we review a district court’s “determination of whether a particular statutory basis for involuntarily terminating parental rights is present for an abuse of discretion.” review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: P. A. S. and D. J. P., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
facts for clear error, but we review its determination of whether a particular statutory basis for involuntarily terminating parental rights is present for an abuse of discretion.” review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: I. M. A. a/k/a I. N. and A. … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: I. M. A. a/k/a I. N. and A. … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-04 (Minn. App. 2011) (holding that the district court did not err in terminating the parental rights of a mother whose children had spent two years in court-ordered foster care and who had “only haphazardly exercised visitation,” failed to address her chemical dependency, and had not secured adequate housing