Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In re the Welfare of J.R.B., 805 N.W.2d 895.

437 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: E. M. U. and W. H. H., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: E. M. U. and W. H. H., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2015
d 895, 899-902 (Minn. App. 2011) (explaining the process the district court goes through when determining whether a statutory basis for terminating parental rights is present in a particular case and that this decision is discretionary with the district court), review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A. S. and T. S., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2015
facts for clear error, but we review its determination of whether a particular statutory 10 basis for involuntarily terminating parental rights is present for an abuse of discretion.” review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: P. J. M. and A. D. H., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: P. J. M. and A. D. H., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“We review a district court’s ultimate determination that termination is in a child’s best interest for an abuse of discretion.” review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: T. S. C. and D. E. D., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: D. L. D. and M. E. F., Parents 865 N.W.2d 315 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: D. L. D. and M. E. F., Parents 865 N.W.2d 315 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
–01 (Minn. App. 2011) (stating that “we will review the district court’s findings of the underlying or basic facts for clear error, but we review its determination of whether a particular statutory basis for involuntarily terminating parental rights is present for an abuse of discretion,” and noting that “[t]h
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: T. S. C. and D. E. D., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: C. A. S. and C. L. K., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: C. A. S. and C. L. K., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: K. L. and F. T., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: K. L. and F. T., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: T. L. V. and B. F., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: T. L. V. and B. F., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(noting that if the district court finds facts that support the existence of a statutory basis to terminate parental rights, whether to invoke that statutory basis is discretionary with the district court), review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: K. A.-P. and D. P., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: K. A.-P. and D. P., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: G. M. L. and T. M. M., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: G. M. L. and T. M. M., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A. J. M. and R. D. S., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A. J. M. and R. D. S., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2014
is palpably unfit for abuse of discretion, keeping in mind that the petitioner bears the burden of proof and must overcome “the presumption that a natural parent is a fit and suitable person to be entrusted with the care of a child.” –02 (Minn. App. 2011) (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S. W. N. and J. L. P., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S. W. N. and J. L. P., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2014
We review a district court’s “findings of the underlying or basic facts for clear error, but we review its determination of whether a particular statutory basis for involuntarily terminating parental rights is present for an abuse of discretion.” review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J. A. S. and R. L. S., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J. A. S. and R. L. S., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J. J. and C. F., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: K. M. A. and M. R. H., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: K. M. A. and M. R. H., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“[W]e review the [district court’s] determination of whether a particular statutory basis for involuntarily terminating parental rights is present for an abuse of discretion.” review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J. J. and C. F., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“[O]n appeal from a district court’s decision to terminate parental rights, we will review the district court’s findings of the underlying or basic facts for clear error, but we review its determination of whether a particular statutory basis for involuntarily terminating parental rights is present for an abuse of discretion.” review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. S. and M. S., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. S. and M. S., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2014
ing whether a particular statutory basis for involuntarily terminating parental rights is present,” appellate courts review “findings of the underlying or basic facts for clear error,” and review the district court’s “determination of whether a particular statutory basis for involuntarily terminating parental rights is present for an abuse of discretion.” 901 (Minn. App. 2011), review denied (Minn. Jan.
In re the Welfare of the Children of M.A.H. 839 N.W.2d 730 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
In re the Welfare of the Children of M.A.H. 839 N.W.2d 730 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
review denied (Minn. Jan.
In re the Welfare of the Children of K.S.F. 823 N.W.2d 656 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
In re the Welfare of the Children of K.S.F. 823 N.W.2d 656 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
at 661 ; (explaining that so long as the record provides clear-and-convincing support for ter *666 mination, an appellate court reviews the district court’s decision to terminate parental rights for an abuse of discretion), review denied (Minn. Jan.
In re the Welfare of the Child of J.K.T. 814 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
In re the Welfare of the Child of J.K.T. 814 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 2012