Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In re the Welfare of J.R.B., 805 N.W.2d 895.

432 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: T. S. C. and D. E. D., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the WELFARE OF the CHILD OF: D.L.D. and M.E.F., Parents 865 N.W.2d 315 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the WELFARE OF the CHILD OF: D.L.D. and M.E.F., Parents 865 N.W.2d 315 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
–01 (Minn. App. 2011) (stating that “we will review the district court’s findings of the underlying or basic facts for clear error, but we review its determination of whether a particular statutory basis for involuntarily terminating parental rights is present for an abuse of discretion,” and noting that “[t]h
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: T. S. C. and D. E. D., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: C. A. S. and C. L. K., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: C. A. S. and C. L. K., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: K. L. and F. T., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: K. L. and F. T., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: T. L. v. and B. F., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: T. L. v. and B. F., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(noting that if the district court finds facts that support the existence of a statutory basis to terminate parental rights, whether to invoke that statutory basis is discretionary with the district court), review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: K. A.-P. and D. P., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: K. A.-P. and D. P., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: G. M. L. and T. M. M., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: G. M. L. and T. M. M., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A. J. M. and R. D. S., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A. J. M. and R. D. S., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
is palpably unfit for abuse of discretion, keeping in mind that the petitioner bears the burden of proof and must overcome “the presumption that a natural parent is a fit and suitable person to be entrusted with the care of a child.” –02 (Minn. App. 2011) (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S. W. N. and J. L. P., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S. W. N. and J. L. P., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
We review a district court’s “findings of the underlying or basic facts for clear error, but we review its determination of whether a particular statutory basis for involuntarily terminating parental rights is present for an abuse of discretion.” review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J. A. S. and R. L. S., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J. A. S. and R. L. S., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J. J. and C. F., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: K. M. A. and M. R. H., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: K. M. A. and M. R. H., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“[W]e review the [district court’s] determination of whether a particular statutory basis for involuntarily terminating parental rights is present for an abuse of discretion.” review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J. J. and C. F., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“[O]n appeal from a district court’s decision to terminate parental rights, we will review the district court’s findings of the underlying or basic facts for clear error, but we review its determination of whether a particular statutory basis for involuntarily terminating parental rights is present for an abuse of discretion.” review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. S. and M. S., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. S. and M. S., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
ing whether a particular statutory basis for involuntarily terminating parental rights is present,” appellate courts review “findings of the underlying or basic facts for clear error,” and review the district court’s “determination of whether a particular statutory basis for involuntarily terminating parental rights is present for an abuse of discretion.” 901 (Minn. App. 2011), review denied (Minn. Jan.
In re the Welfare of the Children of M.A.H. 839 N.W.2d 730 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
In re the Welfare of the Children of M.A.H. 839 N.W.2d 730 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
review denied (Minn. Jan.
In re the Welfare of the Children of K.S.F. 823 N.W.2d 656 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
In re the Welfare of the Children of K.S.F. 823 N.W.2d 656 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
at 661 ; (explaining that so long as the record provides clear-and-convincing support for ter *666 mination, an appellate court reviews the district court’s decision to terminate parental rights for an abuse of discretion), review denied (Minn. Jan.
In re the Welfare of the Child of J.K.T. 814 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
In re the Welfare of the Child of J.K.T. 814 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 2012

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by