Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Vazquez v. State, 822 N.W.2d 313.

56 citing documents.

Washington v. State 845 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Washington v. State 845 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
coexist[s] with the postconviction remedy.”
Orozco v. State 841 N.W.2d 632 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Orozco v. State 841 N.W.2d 632 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Appellant argues that the district court erred in summarily denying his motion as if it were a petition for postconviction relief because, in two recent decisions, this court determined that the two-year limitations period for filing a postconviction petition does not apply to a motion brought under rule 27.03.
State v. Amundson 828 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Amundson 828 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
After Amundson filed a notice of appeal