Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In re the Estate of Rutt, 824 N.W.2d 641.

29 citing documents.

In re the Estate of John Kenneth Rutt AKA John K. Rutt and John Rutt, Deceased. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
22, 2010); (Rutt II), rev. denied (Minn. Jan.
In re the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. M. B. (Mth) and I. C. R. … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. M. B. (Mth) and I. C. R. … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“Application of a statute to the undisputed facts of a case involves a question of law, and the district court’s decision is not binding on this court.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Jan.
In re the Estate of John Kenneth Rutt, a/k/a John K. Rutt and John Rutt Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In re the Estate of John Kenneth Rutt, a/k/a John K. Rutt and John Rutt Minn. Ct. App. 2023
22, 2010) (Rutt I); rev. denied (Minn. Jan.
Joseph Roach, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
We also review de novo the “[a]pplication of a statute to the undisputed facts of a case.” In re Est. of Rutt , (quotation omitted).
Fr. William Graham, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“An assignment of error based on mere assertion and not supported by any argument or authorities in appellant’s brief is waived and will not be considered on appeal unless prejudicial error is obvious on mere inspection.” d 641, 648 (Minn. App. 2012) (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Jan.
In re the Estate of John Kenneth Rutt, a/k/a John K. Rutt and John Rutt, Deceased. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Hearing Associates, Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
As stated above, this court waived and will not be considered on appeal unless pr ejudicial error is obvious on mere inspection.” In re Estate of Rutt , (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Jan.
In re the Marriage of: Wakisha Nicole Fortwengler, n/k/a Alexa Nicole Schultz, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“An assignment of error based on mere assertion and not supported by any argument or authorities in appellant’ s brief is [forfeited] and will not be considered on appeal unless prejudicial error is obvious on mere inspection .” In re Estate of Rutt , (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Jan.
In re the Marriage of: Michelle Beth Kremer v. Robbie Michael Kremer 889 N.W.2d 41 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Michelle Beth Kremer v. Robbie Michael Kremer 889 N.W.2d 41 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Statutory construction is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Jan.
Eric Wong v. Chatterbox Pub Enterprises, Inc., Tyrone Sharpe Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Eric Wong v. Chatterbox Pub Enterprises, Inc., Tyrone Sharpe Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Jan.
Thomas C. Rubey v. Valerie A. Vannett Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Thomas C. Rubey v. Valerie A. Vannett Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(“An assignment of error based on mere assertion and not supported by any argument or authorities in appellant’s brief is waived and will not be considered on appeal unless prejudicial error is obvious on mere inspection.” (quotation omitted)), review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the WELFARE OF the Child Of: J.P.-S. and J.D.F., Parents 880 N.W.2d 868 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the WELFARE OF the Child Of: J.P.-S. and J.D.F., Parents 880 N.W.2d 868 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Jan.
In re the Marriage of: Tamara Eileen Goemaat v. Andrew Joel Goemaat Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Tamara Eileen Goemaat v. Andrew Joel Goemaat Minn. Ct. App. 2015
648 (Minn. App. 2012) (“An assignment of error based on mere assertion and not supported by any argument or authorities in appellant’s brief is waived and will not be considered on appeal unless prejudicial error is obvious on mere inspection.” (quotation omitted)
Timothy T. Childs v. North River Road Condominium Association Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Timothy T. Childs v. North River Road Condominium Association Minn. Ct. App. 2015
is waived and will not be considered on appeal unless prejudicial error is obvious on mere inspection.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Jan.
In re the Matter of: A. B. Wayne Belisle v. Yana Verzhbitskaya Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Matter of: A. B. Wayne Belisle v. Yana Verzhbitskaya Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(providing that “an assignment of error based on mere assertion and not supported by any argument or authorities” is forfeited (quotation omitted)), review denied (Minn. Jan.
Jovani Nassar v. U.S. Home Corporation d/b/a Lennar Homes Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jovani Nassar v. U.S. Home Corporation d/b/a Lennar Homes Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(providing that a party who inadequately briefs an argument forfeits that argument), review denied (Minn. Jan.
Coco's Heart Dog Rescue v. Ann Marie Hawthorne Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Coco's Heart Dog Rescue v. Ann Marie Hawthorne Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(“An assignment of error in a brief based on mere assertion and not supported by argument or authority is waived unless prejudicial error is obvious on mere inspection.” (quotation omitted)), review denied (Minn. Jan.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by