Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Peter, 825 N.W.2d 126.

86 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Alonzo Crowder Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Krystal Elizabeth Alwin Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Krystal Elizabeth Alwin Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Alonzo Crowder Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“Requests for durational departures require the district court to consider whether the conduct involved in the offense of conviction was significantly more or less serious than the typical conduct for that crime.” review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Jacob Miles Solberg 869 N.W.2d 66 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jacob Miles Solberg 869 N.W.2d 66 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. John Jay Pederson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. John Jay Pederson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
The district court also considered the factors relevant to a durational departure, such as “whether the conduct involved in the offense of conviction was significantly more or less serious than the typical conduct for that crime.” review denied (Minn. Feb.
Jose Manuel Flores v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jose Manuel Flores v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(“[T]he district court, like this court, is bound by supreme court precedent and the published opinions of the court of appeals.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Parnard Smith, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Shannon Marie Kiesner Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Shannon Marie Kiesner Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Parnard Smith, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-31 (Minn. App. 2012) (listing offender- related factors as including post-offense remorse, lack of felony record, youth of defendant, family support, defendant’s ability to obtain meaningful employment and education), review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Baruch Kefa Nieznanski Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Bradley James Schnickel Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Bradley James Schnickel Minn. Ct. App. 2015
19, 1998); see also Chaklos, d at 228, (“Caselaw is settled that offender-related factors do not support durational departures.”).
State of Minnesota v. Baruch Kefa Nieznanski Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Durational departures require the district court “to consider whether the conduct involved in the offense of conviction was significantly more or less serious than the typical conduct for that crime.” review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Curtis Wayne Regguinti Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Leroy Lamar Morris Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Leroy Lamar Morris Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Curtis Wayne Regguinti Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“[O]ffender-related factors do not support durational departures.” review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Hope Marie Carlson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Hope Marie Carlson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
uring the proceedings she “was not in custody and did not engage in any thefts,” “she used her time to volunteer as a medical assistant at a clinic so that she could maintain her skills,” and “had not engaged in this behavior before—her criminal history score was zero.” These circumstances are irrelevant because “offender- related factors do not support durational departures.” review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Raymond Benjamin Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Raymond Benjamin Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State v. Chaklos, 528 review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Jeffery Dale Trevino Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jeffery Dale Trevino Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Jared Armand Cobb Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jared Armand Cobb Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“Requests for durational departures require the district court to consider whether the conduct involved in the offense of conviction was significantly more or less serious than the typical conduct for that crime.” review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Leann Bobleter Sargent Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Leann Bobleter Sargent Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. David Edward Westgard Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. David Edward Westgard Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Terry Gene Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Terry Gene Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2014