Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State of Minnesota v. Mo Savoy Hicks, 864 N.W.2d 153.

116 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Christopher Dennis Peterson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Reynaldo Benitez Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Dennis Peterson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“The Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines promote uniformity, proportionality, and predictability in sentencing.”
State of Minnesota v. Reynaldo Benitez Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Isaiah Triell Hall Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Isaiah Triell Hall Minn. Ct. App. 2015
First Strickland element – objective standard of reasonableness “The Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines promote uniformity, proportionality, and predictability in sentencing.”
State of Minnesota v. Benjamin Paul Adams Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Benjamin Paul Adams Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“We review a district court’s decision to depart from the presumptive guidelines sentence for an abuse of discretion.”
State of Minnesota v. Alexander Nathan Davis Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Alexander Nathan Davis Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(“The doctrine of stare decisis directs us to adhere to our former decisions in order to promote the stability of the law and the integrity of the judicial process.” (quotation omitted)).
State of Minnesota v. August Latimothy Fleming 869 N.W.2d 319 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. August Latimothy Fleming 869 N.W.2d 319 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Alonzo Crowder Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Alonzo Crowder Minn. Ct. App. 2015
DECISION I. Downward Durational Departure “The Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines promote uniformity, proportionality, and predictability in sentencing.”
State of Minnesota v. Larry Darnell Lakes Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Larry Darnell Lakes Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In this way, the sentencing guidelines “promote uniformity, proportionality, and predictability.”