Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Porte, 832 N.W.2d 303.

237 citing documents.

Ricky Alan Geving v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-10 (Minn. App. 2013) (- 06 (Minn. 2013) (Stras, J., concurring)); (applying circumstantial-evidence standard of review because state did not introduce direct evidence of possession of firearm).
State of Minnesota v. Jason David Fredrickson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jason David Fredrickson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. David Lee King Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. David Lee King Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Elvis Joko Porte Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Elvis Joko Porte Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-12, 314 (Minn. App. 2013).
State of Minnesota v. Karen Sue Butcher Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Karen Sue Butcher Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Dominic Jason Allen Sam 859 N.W.2d 825 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Dominic Jason Allen Sam 859 N.W.2d 825 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
8 See, (witness at trial reported that he gave the defendant the drugs).
State of Minnesota v. Stephanie JoNell Guscette Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Stephanie JoNell Guscette Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Michael Allen Truelove Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Michael Allen Truelove Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See Huss, d at 292; –09 (Minn. App. 2013) (rejecting argument that cocaine found in van driven by defendant could have belonged to van’s owner or 9 passenger, when owner and passenger testified at jury trial and denied possession of cocaine).
State of Minnesota v. John Yang Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. David Arthur LaRose Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. John Yang Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. David Arthur LaRose Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(Stras, J., concurring in part) (reasoning that “there is no reason to evaluate the reasonableness of inferences that the jury is never required to make” and concluding that “the ‘circumstantial evidence standard’ does not apply to our review of an element of a criminal offense that the State has proven by direct evidence”); (stating that “[w]hether we apply the standard of review applicable to circumstantial evidence depends on whether the conviction necessarily depends on circumstantial eviden
State of Minnesota v. Jennifer Lynn Humphrey Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Jennifer Lynn Humphrey Minn. Ct. App. 2014
DECISION We review a claim of insufficient evidence by conducting “a painstaking analysis of the record to determine whether the evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the conviction, is sufficient to allow the jurors to reach a verdict of guilty.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Kenny Dewayne Cooper Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Kenny Dewayne Cooper Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Thomas Leonsaco Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Thomas Leonsaco Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(-75 (Minn. 2010); d 312, 319-20 (Minn. 2005); ).
State of Minnesota v. Shawn Elson Randall Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Shawn Elson Randall Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Dayna Kristine Bell Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Dayna Kristine Bell Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Reinaldo Quesada Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Devon Scott Martin Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Devon Scott Martin Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Reinaldo Quesada Minn. Ct. App. 2014
3(c) (2012); Vlahos v. R & I Constr., Inc., n.3 (Minn. 2004); n.1 (Minn. App. 2013).
State of Minnesota v. Derrick Deshawn Shumpert Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Derrick Deshawn Shumpert Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. McCormick 835 N.W.2d 498 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. McCormick 835 N.W.2d 498 Minn. Ct. App. 2013