Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Townsend v. State, 834 N.W.2d 736.

70 citing documents.

Jolonda Rae Roberts v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jolonda Rae Roberts v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(noting that the standard of review for the denial of a petition for postconviction relief is the same as the standard for reviewing a motion to correct a sentence).
State of Minnesota v. Jason Ryan Williams 862 N.W.2d 701 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jason Ryan Williams 862 N.W.2d 701 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Michael John Mahle Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Michael John Mahle Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“[A] defendant is entitled to a credit from his term of imprisonment for the number of days spent in custody in connection with the offense or behavioral incident being sentenced.” (quotation omitted).
Larry Roosevelt Noble v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Larry Roosevelt Noble v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
The supreme court has not prevented these motions, id., nor has the supreme court yet considered “whether the statutory time bar under section 590.01, subdivision 4(a)(2) or the procedural bar under Knaffla apply to 3 a motion to correct a sentence under rule 27.03, subdivision 9.”
State of Minnesota v. Jack Perry Frazier Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Jack Perry Frazier Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Randall Mark Spears v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Randall Mark Spears v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
factual findings under the clearly erroneous standard.”
State of Minnesota v. Sam Horace Meeks Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Sam Horace Meeks Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“The relevant procedures for review of a sentence are provided by the Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure and Minnesota Statutes.”
David Laurence Hodges v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
David Laurence Hodges v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Kim Thul Ouk v. State 847 N.W.2d 698 Minn. 2014
Kim Thul Ouk v. State 847 N.W.2d 698 Minn. 2014
Washington v. State 845 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Washington v. State 845 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
See, (offender’s motion); -77 (Minn.2011) (offender’s motion); (state’s motion).