Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Amundson, 828 N.W.2d 747.
-
Orozco v. State
841 N.W.2d 632
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Appellant argues that the district court erred in summarily denying his motion as if it were a petition for postconviction relief because, in two recent decisions, this court determined that the two-year limitations period for filing a postconviction petition does not apply to a motion brought under rule 27.03.