Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State of Minnesota v. Christopher Thomas Wenthe, 865 N.W.2d 293.

130 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Mark Robert Moser 884 N.W.2d 890 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Mark Robert Moser 884 N.W.2d 890 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
10 the Minnesota Supreme Court interpreted the clergy-criminal-sexual-conduct statute.
State of Minnesota v. Robert Michael Heath Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Robert Michael Heath Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Tammy Jo Schoenrock Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Tammy Jo Schoenrock Minn. Ct. App. 2016
DECISION A “[d]enial of a requested jury instruction is reviewed for abuse of discretion.” cert.
State of Minnesota v. Mackey Keyota Drake Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Sedne Bonitaz Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Mackey Keyota Drake Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“An error affects a defendant’s substantial rights if the error was prejudicial and affected the outcome of the case.” (quotations omitted), cert.
State of Minnesota v. Sedne Bonitaz Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2016
16, 1992); (stating that “[g]enerally, criminal sexual conduct offenses require only an intent to sexually penetrate, unless additional mens rea requirements are expressly provided”).
State of Minnesota v. Jose Antonio Diaz-Arreguin Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Jose Antonio Diaz-Arreguin Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“District courts have wide discretion on discovery rulings,” d 579, 603 (Minn. 2005), and appellate courts review evidentiary rulings “for an abuse of discretion, even when a constitutional violation is alleged,” d 293, 306 (Minn. 2015), cert.
State of Minnesota v. Timothy John Huber 877 N.W.2d 519 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Timothy John Huber 877 N.W.2d 519 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Virginia Marie Carlson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Philip Lee Carlson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Virginia Marie Carlson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Philip Lee Carlson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Alie Christine Theodore Dorn 875 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Alie Christine Theodore Dorn 875 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(stating that the supreme court has “been particularly hesitant to dispense with mens rea when doing so would result in a strict liability offense”).
State of Minnesota v. Alexander Kenton Edmondson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Alexander Kenton Edmondson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review granted (June 25, 2014), rev’d
In re: the Petition of K. P. W. and J. L. H. to Adopt S. Q.-B. W., a … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re: the Petition of K. P. W. and J. L. H. to Adopt S. Q.-B. W., a … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
It is not the function of this court to “supply that which the legislature purposely omits or inadvertently overlooks.”
State of Minnesota v. Thomas James Mitchell Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Thomas James Mitchell Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Nathan Thomas Boutilier Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Nathan Thomas Boutilier Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Because Boutilier did not request a unanimity instruction, or otherwise object, “we review for (1) error, (2) that is plain, and (3) that affects [Boutilier’s] substantial rights.” ().
State of Minnesota v. Brian Matthew Husnick Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Brian Matthew Husnick Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(“Generally, criminal sexual conduct offenses require only an intent to sexually penetrate.