Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Hanson, 841 N.W.2d 161.

59 citing documents.

Sibley Plaza Limited Partners, LP, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Hegenes Properties, LLC v. Michelle Rodriguez, John Doe Minn. Ct. App. 2026
(“Eviction actions are summary proceedings that are intended to adjudicate only the limited question of present possessory rights to the property.”); Fed.
Constance M Johnson, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Matthew Davies, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Doris A. Seward v. Taylor Florin-Clemants, John Doe Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Doris A. Seward v. Taylor Florin-Clemants, John Doe Minn. Ct. App. 2024
SV AP III Riverdale Commons LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Respondent, vs. Coon Rapids Gyms, LLC, dba … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See, -66 (Minn. App. 2014); Bjorklund v. Bjorklund Trucking, Inc., -20 (Minn. App. 2008), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
Community Housing Services - Park Towers, Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Th e limited nature of this relief is consistent with the limited nature of an eviction action, which is a “s ummary proceeding[] that [is] intended to adjudicate only the limited question of present possessory rights to the property.” Deutsche Bank Nat’l ().
Amy Sue Denzer, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Hanson, (stating that “[p]arties generally may not litigate related claims in an eviction proceeding”).
Cent. Hous. Assocs., LP v. Olson 910 N.W.2d 485 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Cent. Hous. Assocs., LP v. Olson 910 N.W.2d 485 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Co. v. Hanson , , 164 (Minn. App. 2014).
Rolling Meadows Cooperative, Inc. v. Macatee 904 N.W.2d 920 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Rolling Meadows Cooperative, Inc. v. Macatee 904 N.W.2d 920 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
4 (2016); see Deutsche Bank Nat’l (“Eviction actions are summary proceedings that are intended to adjudicate only the limited question of present possessory rights to the property.”).
Nuvola, LLC v. Morgan Wright Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Nuvola, LLC v. Morgan Wright Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Ronald D. Van Riper v. Bonnie L. Roy Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Ronald D. Van Riper v. Bonnie L. Roy Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Washington County HRA v. Kuohsiou Huang Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Washington County HRA v. Kuohsiou Huang Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Arrow Southampton, LLC v. Jeremiah Akinnola Minn. Ct. App. 2016
U. S. Bank National Association as Legal Title Trustee for Truman 2012 SC Title Trust v. Thomas J. … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Arrow Southampton, LLC v. Jeremiah Akinnola Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Deutsche Bank Nat’l Trust 6 see also Minn. Stat. § 504B.001, subd.
U. S. Bank National Association as Legal Title Trustee for Truman 2012 SC Title Trust v. Thomas J. … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Cf. 8 Deutsche Bank Nat’l (denying a request to stay eviction proceedings where the Hansons did not seek an injunction, had not “taken much action at all” in the related litigation, and did not file a lis pendens).
Victor Legatt v. Dennis Legatt Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Victor Legatt v. Dennis Legatt Minn. Ct. App. 2015
ion for nonpayment of rent was an eviction action because the parties had a landlord-tenant relationship, which gave Victor a “right of redemption.” Even if the parties had a landlord-tenant relationship, “[e]viction actions are summary proceedings that are intended to adjudicate only the limited question of present possessory rights to the property.” Deutsche Bank Nat’l
S3 Holdings, LLC v. Stephen R. Niosi, John Doe Minn. Ct. App. 2015
S3 Holdings, LLC v. Stephen R. Niosi, John Doe Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Deutsche Bank Nat’l see also Minn. Stat. § 504B.001, subd.
Bank of America, National Association v. James B. Schelling Minn. Ct. App. 2015
U. S. Bank National Association v. Blanca J. Sacta, John Doe Minn. Ct. App. 2015
U. S. Bank National Association v. Blanca J. Sacta, John Doe Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Deutsche Bank Nat’l see also Minn. Stat. § 504B.001, subd.
Bank of America, National Association v. James B. Schelling Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Bank of America, National Association v. Terry Alan Thornberg, John Doe Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Bank of America, National Association v. Terry Alan Thornberg, John Doe Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Further, the district court held “[appellants] are not entitled to a stay of this action merely because they have commenced another action challenging the validity of the underlying foreclosure,” citing Deutsche Bank Nat’l
Federal National Mortgage Association v. Gretchen R. L. Harvey, Gerald Von Grewe Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Federal National Mortgage Association v. Gretchen R. L. Harvey, Gerald Von Grewe Minn. Ct. App. 2015
U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee for the C-BASS Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2006-RP2 v. Timothy Knoedler, … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
The Bank of New York Mellon fka the Bank of New York v. Simon C. Reff Minn. Ct. App. 2015
The Bank of New York Mellon fka the Bank of New York v. Simon C. Reff Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See Deutsche Bank Nat’l -65 (Minn. App. 2014) (discussing the limited scope of an eviction action).
U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee for the C-BASS Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2006-RP2 v. Timothy Knoedler, … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See Dahlberg, 231 Minn. at 68, d at 576 (stating that an eviction proceeding “merely determines the right to present possession and does 5 not adjudicate the ultimate legal or equitable rights of ownership possessed by the parties”); see also Deutsche Bank Nat’l (stating that the scope of an eviction action is limited to the question of “present possessory rights to the property,” and that generally, other related claims are not litigated in an eviction action proceeding, unless they “fit within
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation v. Gary E. Mitchell, John Doe 862 N.W.2d 67 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation v. Gary E. Mitchell, John Doe 862 N.W.2d 67 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Since an eviction action “merely determines the right to present possession and does not adjudicate the ultimate legal or equitable rights of ownership possessed by the parties,” Dahlberg v. Young, 231 Minn. 60, 68, d 570, 576 (1950); cf. Deutsche Bank Nat’l (“Resolving a challenge to the validity of [a] foreclosed mortgage is not essential to an eviction action.”), their challenge to Freddie Mac’s legal capacity to bring an eviction action is meritless.
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Julie Quale, John Doe Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Julie Quale, John Doe Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Federal National Mortgage Association v. Vaambee Yang, John Doe Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Federal National Mortgage Association v. Vaambee Yang, John Doe Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See Deutsche Bank Nat’l (discussing the district court’s “considerable discretion” to expand or to limit the scope of an eviction action); d 829, 837 (Minn. 2004) (“[A] right, question or fact distinctly put in issue and directly determined by a court of competent jurisdi
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation v. Renee C. Kinzer, John Doe Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation v. Patricia G. Mikelson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation v. Renee C. Kinzer, John Doe Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation v. Patricia G. Mikelson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
The bond must provide that all costs of the appeal will be paid, the posting party will comply with the 3 See Deutsche Bank Nat’l -66 (Minn. App. 2014) (affirming a district court’s denial of a motion to stay an eviction proceeding based on the eviction defendants’ assertion that their claims in a related federal action “were a necessary component of their defense to [the] eviction action”); Fed.
The Bank of New York Mellon formerly known as the Bank of New York, as Trustee v. Anthony … Minn. Ct. App. 2014