Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In re the Welfare of the Children of M.A.H., 839 N.W.2d 730.

75 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: D. C. a/k/a Q. N. F. (W.), Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: D. C. a/k/a Q. N. F. (W.), Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In determining the child’s best interests, the district court weighs three primary factors: “the child’s interest in maintaining the parent-child relationship, the parents’ interest in maintaining the parent-child relationship, and any competing interest of the child.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: K. Y., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Competing interests of the child “include a stable environment, health considerations, and the child’s preferences.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J.M.B., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J.M.B., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Competing interests of the child “include a stable environment, health considerations, and the child’s preferences.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: P. A. S. and D. J. P., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: P. A. S. and D. J. P., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Once a district court determines that at least one of the statutory grounds for termination has been met, it must also find that termination is in the child’s best interests.”
Sarah Elizabeth LeBlanc v. Alonzo Marell Lee Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: C. J. S., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Sarah Elizabeth LeBlanc v. Alonzo Marell Lee Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: C. J. S., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
The three primary factors in a best-interests analysis are “the child’s interest in maintaining the parent-child relationship, the parents’ interest in maintaining the parent- child relationship, and any competing interest of the child.” see also Minn. R. Juv.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: C.L.T. and J.T., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: C.L.T. and J.T., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
The best-interests analysis “consists of weighing three primary factors: the child's interest in maintaining the parent-child relationship, the parents’ interest in maintaining the parent-child relationship, and any competing interest of the child.” Minn. R. Juv.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S. J., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S. J., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: C. M., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: A. S. R. and M. J. I., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: C. M., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Competing interests include a stable environment, health considerations, and the child’s preferences.” (citation omitted).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: A. S. R. and M. J. I., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: I. M. W. and R. J. M., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: I. M. W. and R. J. M., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: T. L. v. and B. F., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: T. L. v. and B. F., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S. W. N. and J. L. P., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S. W. N. and J. L. P., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
742 (Minn. App. 2013) (concluding that record supported district court’s conclusion that egregious harm was experienced by severely malnourished child with protruding abdomen, below average bone growth, brain atrophy, and refeeding syndrome); –66 (Mi