Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Jason Donald Matakis v. State of Minnesota, 862 N.W.2d 33.

154 citing documents.

Ronald Aaron McCord v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Ronald Aaron McCord v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“We review the denial of a petition for postconviction relief for an abuse of discretion.” (quotation omitted).
Jimmie Dunlap, Jr. v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Patrick Samuel Meszaros v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Charlie Junior Pryor v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Patrick Samuel Meszaros v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
The requirement that a plea be accurate “protect[s] a defendant from pleading guilty to a more serious offense than he could be convicted of if he were to go to trial.” (quotation omitted).
Charlie Junior Pryor v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“We review legal issues de novo, but on factual issues our review is limited to whether there is sufficient evidence in the record to sustain the postconviction court’s findings.” (quotation omitted).
Jimmie Dunlap, Jr. v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Michael Delaney Harris v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jonathan Nicholas Turner v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jonathan Nicholas Turner v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
We review legal issues de novo, but our review of factual issues is “limited to whether there is sufficient evidence in the record to sustain the postconviction court’s findings.” (quotation omitted).
Michael Delaney Harris v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“[Appellate courts] review legal issues de novo,” but our review of factual issues “is 2 limited to whether there is sufficient evidence in the record to sustain the postconviction court’s findings.” (quotation omitted).
Tracy Alan Zornes v. State of Minnesota 880 N.W.2d 363 Minn. 2016
Tracy Alan Zornes v. State of Minnesota 880 N.W.2d 363 Minn. 2016
Christopher Joseph Washington v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Christopher Joseph Washington v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
We review legal issues de novo, but on factual issues our review “is limited to whether there is sufficient evidence in the record to sustain the postconviction court’s findings.” ().
Jeffrey Edward Morey v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jeffrey Edward Morey v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Accurate Plea The requirement that a plea be accurate “protect[s] a defendant from pleading guilty to a more serious offense than he could be convicted of if he were to go to trial.” (quotation omitted).
Rojelio Castillo v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jullius Antwon Coleman v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Rojelio Castillo v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“We review legal issues de novo, but on factual issues our review is limited to whether there is sufficient evidence in the record to sustain the postconviction court’s findings.” (quotation omitted).
Jullius Antwon Coleman v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Gregory Lee Cobbins v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Lyndsey Rae Kidd v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Gregory Lee Cobbins v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“We review legal issues de novo, but on factual issues our review is limited to whether there is sufficient evidence in the record to sustain the postconviction court’s findings.” (quotation omitted).
Lyndsey Rae Kidd v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“We review legal issues de novo, but on factual issues our review is limited to whether there is sufficient evidence in the record to sustain the postconviction court’s findings.” (quotation omitted).
Freddie Lee Jenkins v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Freddie Lee Jenkins v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jamel Daniel Hoard v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Rojelio Castillo v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jamel Daniel Hoard v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Rojelio Castillo v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Casey James Pederson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Casey James Pederson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Rojelio Castillo v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Rojelio Castillo v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jermaine Kershawn Perry v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jermaine Kershawn Perry v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Vidale Lee Whitson, Vidale Lee Whitson v. State of Minnesota, C5-02-2108 876 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Vidale Lee Whitson, Vidale Lee Whitson v. State of Minnesota, C5-02-2108 876 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 2016
see also Minn. Stat. § 590.04, subd.
Keith Richard Rossberg v. State of Minnesota 874 N.W.2d 786 Minn. 2016
Keith Richard Rossberg v. State of Minnesota 874 N.W.2d 786 Minn. 2016
Knawon Antony Conda v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Knawon Antony Conda v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
We review legal issues de novo, but on factual issues our review is limited to whether there is sufficient evidence in the record to sustain the postconviction court’s findings.” (citation and quotation omitted).
Joshua Steven Parsons v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Joshua Steven Parsons v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
DECISION We review a postconviction court’s denial of postconviction relief for an abuse of discretion, reviewing legal issues de novo and factual issues to determine “whether there is sufficient evidence in the record to sustain the postconviction court’s findings.” 2 (quotation omitted).
Megan Marie Kochendorfer v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Scott Andrew Marcucci v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Scott Andrew Marcucci v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“We review legal issues de novo, but on factual issues our review is limited to whether there is sufficient evidence in the record to sustain the postconviction court’s findings.” (citations and quotations omitted).
Megan Marie Kochendorfer v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015