Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Cubas, 838 N.W.2d 220.

78 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Corey Edward Fisherman Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Corey Edward Fisherman Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Dec.
State of Minnesota v. Michael Robert Robinson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Michael Robert Robinson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
We review the denial of a motion to withdraw a guilty plea under the fair and just standard for an abuse of discretion, and will reverse only in a “rare case.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Dec.
State of Minnesota v. Rudolph Gordon Cooper Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Rudolph Gordon Cooper Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“We review a district court’s decision regarding a motion to withdraw a guilty plea under the fair-and-just standard for an abuse of discretion, reversing only in the ‘rare case.’” (), review denied (Minn. Dec.
State of Minnesota v. Giavonte Dominique Foulks Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Giavonte Dominique Foulks Minn. Ct. App. 2015
But even where the state is not prejudiced, “a district court may deny plea withdrawal under rule 15.05, subdivision 2, if the defendant fails to advance valid reasons why withdrawal is fair and just.” review denied (Dec.
State of Minnesota v. Dale Allen Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Dale Allen Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“Even when there is no prejudice to the state, a district court may deny plea withdrawal under rule 15.05, subdivision 2, if the defendant fails to advance valid reasons why withdrawal is fair and just.” review denied (Minn. Dec.
State of Minnesota v. Earl Anthony Fry Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Earl Anthony Fry Minn. Ct. App. 2015
A district court’s denial of a motion to withdraw a guilty plea under this standard is reviewed for an abuse of discretion, and we will reverse “only in the rare case.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Dec.
State of Minnesota v. Ann Adrion Schoch Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ann Adrion Schoch Minn. Ct. App. 2015
But even if the state does not establish prejudice, the district court does not abuse its discretion by denying plea withdrawal “if the defendant fails to advance valid reasons why withdrawal 4 is fair and just.” review denied (Minn. Dec.
State of Minnesota v. Chauncey Lanell Jackson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Chauncey Lanell Jackson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(holding that a district court may deny the withdrawal even if there is no threat of prejudice to the state, “if the defendant fails to advance valid reasons why withdrawal is fair and just”), review denied (Minn. Dec.
State of Minnesota v. Luis Armando Cubas Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Erick Antwan Casey Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Luis Armando Cubas Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Dec.
State of Minnesota v. Erick Antwan Casey Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See Raleigh, d at 98; review denied (Minn. Dec.
State of Minnesota v. Kai Yang Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Kai Yang Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. Dec.
State of Minnesota v. Mohammed Mohammed Ali Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Mohammed Mohammed Ali Minn. Ct. App. 2014
See Raleigh, d at 98; (“Even when there is no prejudice to the state, a district court may deny plea withdrawal under rule 15.05, subdivision 2, if the defendant fails to advance valid reasons why withdrawal is fair and just.”), review denied (Minn. Dec.
State of Minnesota v. Michael Lee Everly Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Michael Lee Everly Minn. Ct. App. 2014
A district court may deny plea withdrawal even when there is no prejudice to the state, “if the defendant fails to advance valid reasons why withdrawal is fair and just.” review denied (Minn. Dec.
State of Minnesota v. Robert Lee Crisler Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Robert Lee Crisler Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(“Although a decision to allow plea withdrawal is discretionary under [Minn. R. Crim.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by